- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
OP got banned. All the proof here comes from Mr.Giang. Look at all the people blind voting!
Selling at less than 2.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20115886 (1 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20110054 (1.66 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20181429 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20151259 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20106188 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20123084 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20136275 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20151915 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19979672 (2 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20168612 (2.11 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19852049 (2.22 ref)
And tons in classified
Feedback, extra/counter proof will be appreciated!
5th link is selling 3 for 2 ref each, proof seems fine, upvote.
why the range though? 2 ref solid would seem more appropriate.
Conservative change
even thou i know it is not necessary unsold for 2.33 would be nice, i think 2 ref flat would be better, upvote since it needs to fall
I have to agree, the S. Natascha has to go down in price. I had one and it was impossible too sell. I think I sold it for 1.66.
But that's my work T_T
Dude, you stole my light T_T
Shouldnt have done a troll suggestion then. We did leave comments that suggestions like that were generally closed by mods.
shrekt