Suggestion: Non-Craftable Mad Milk at 0.11 ref

Price Suggestion

~0.22 ref

67 votes up

79 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 14 Jun 14 00:44:08 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Lol

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20207025 - Bought for uncraft phlog

huge lack of proof.. and the proof you show, not even a proof. shows nothing. it isn't even sold.

1 proof is definitely not enough. The guy on outpost clearly has no idea what he's doing. He just picked prices at random. Even still, an uncraft phlog is still not a tremendous upgrade, and is not worth increasing the price 100%.

good proof, upvote

Certainly a lack of proof.

Only 1 seller on OP and 1 recent sales. Uncraft suggestions can pass with this.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19839474 - sold for 0.05

checked its history, doesn't go anywhere

it's still in his bp too

Same with this item.

All I see is a seller. Who's supposed to have bought it?

read what I wrote next to the link

You need proof, you can't just claim that a sale has happened if it's not in the link.

I was being sarcastic, if anyone didn't pick that up.

I understood. It makes it less funny if you post it here.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/539960074cd7b812628b475b took 1 sale

But he had proof. This is just a link and a statement.

close this and just wait until it solds.

#Riseoftheuncrafts?

Read carefully. 'Bought for uncraft phlog'

yeah I don't get it, he still has the mad milk in his inventory?

Oh god guys it says BOUGHT not SOLD read the proof before commenting

but u provided no proof that he bought it for one, your just showing that he is selling it. please provide a screenshot of the trade where he bought it or the outpost link.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/item/440,2376616190,222,6 -> http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/388909 doesn't actually use outpost, not sure how diamond came up with this :< I even tried to historical view from bptf back a while, and I haven't found anything that would make this make sense :<

When you say "Bought for uncraft phlog" it can easily be interpreted as either

1. The seller bought it for such, which you didn't prove

2. Someone else bought it from him for the uncraft phlog, which didn't happen.

Seeing as how none of the previous owners have never made a trade for this item, you NEED a screenshot or some other way to prove this sale. You could have just as easily said it was traded for a crate and tried to lower the price.

he doesn't even own an uncraftable phlog :c?

Proof that 0.05 is a quicksell?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/item/440,2376616190,222,6 so you're saying he bought this for the phlog... even though the item id shows it's been with this guy for over 3 months?

The provided link does not demonstrate the claimed trade, no proof has been provided to verify said trade.

Closing.