Price Suggestion
Genuine Triple A Badge
Submitted by Rajsh
~2.3 keys
Genuine Triple A Badge
229 votes up
43 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Seems like this -> http://backpack.tf/vote/id/538b0fc24cd7b8ee548b4b9b#comment-538da6654cd7b8f4138b4aea


Just because you quickbuy them at 7 ref, doesn't means it belongs to the range. You need actual sellers at 7 ref. Sorry, but downvote from me.

    The difference being that this suggestion has a range while the other did not. I've also bought 10 more since closing that suggestion.


    According to the definition pinned in backpack.tf forums ([url]http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/forum/4-team-fortress-2-economy[/url]) I am not a quick buyer. I do not buy below market value with the intention of reselling higher for a profit. If that were the case, I would a) have sold them and b) not be lowering the price.


    As a collector with a very limited budget, I'm obviously keen on buying at the lowest possible price! Why wouldn't I be? I offer below their current bp.tf value and many accept having failed to sell at a higher price.


    Backpack.tf exists to provide an accurate representation of the market and it is obviously failing in this instance.

    Quickbuyers not valid proof, 0 sellers provided.

      Quickbuyers not valid proof


      Please refer to my response to the comment above.


      0 sellers provided


      Aside from the seller clearly listed under ''sold/bought @ ~7 refined'', you're correct. However, I feel that the proof I've provided fulfils much the same role given the circumstances.

      If all of the purchases were through the buyer trade, there wouldn't be enough to include in range. However, sufficient sellers have been provided, votes are strong, no counterproof has been provided, key is remaining in range in light of the successful 1 key sales.


      Accepting.