Price Suggestion
~1.44 ref
Unique Towering Pillar of Hats
256 votes up
119 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I may fail at pricing all of them at once, but I will succeed at pricing them individually.


Quick-sold for 1.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20773009

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20731893


Sold for 1.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20736693

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20595139


Sold for 1.55

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20631334


Sold for 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20733598

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20600618


Conclusion: 1.33 went to fast so it shouldn't belong in the range. It's rare so that's all!

Feel free to counter / support my proofs.

    Towering rises before Modest? What is this sorcery?


    Jokes aside, some more proof could be helpful, but it looks good so far. Upvote!

      It's so rare so I think this is enough.

      And Towering has 3 hats with it, it should go first!

      The first link in 1.44 solds hasnt been sold, it is still with its seller

        Sorry I've been mistaken

          Sold.

          Don't check history, they are unreliable.

            Yea I just realized that

          Ok proof is in order and looks good.

          Upvote

            to poor prove

            down vote

              Look at the market then say it again, I dare you.

              Then it still should be 1.33-1.66

                Where is your 1.33 proof?

                  http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19708105

                  He is the only one on outpost who sells it at a firm price at the moment, and the price is 1.33

                    Bots are not valid for suggestion so no. I try my best to exclude them out of the proof.

                      Someone still decided to sell at that price, not? I checked, the bot buys it at 1.22 (not a normal price) and sells for 1.33 (looks like the normal price)

                        Then that bot quick-bought that hat, so even more invalid proof from you.