I don't know why you're struggling to see why I bother involving it when it isn't even relevant to anything. This is my suggestion, I'm free to include in whatever I wish as long as it's not breaking any site rules.

You seem to doubt whether the evidence I stated here are true. I have more than 250 accepted suggestions and this is my way of writing down the proof. Which is why I said, if you don't trust what I wrote here, feel free to check them yourself. Also, it is not really your concern whether all this evidence are genuine or not. That's for the mods to worry about, not you. Of course, at anytime you find out that what I wrote here isn't true, you can always counter my evidence, feel free to do so.

Don't misquote me. None of this is my job. I don't benefit anything from this, neither am I paid to do this. This is a voluntary suggestion and all evidence provided are up to the users to believe or not.

Also, you claim that "checking the sellers backpack" would ignore all cash transactions and any pure quickly spent:

1. Let me ask you this. How are you going to determine whether cash transaction was involved? And if this is becoming a doubt, 90% of unusual suggestions will not pass because there will be ppl like you asking "what if cash was involved". As long as the seller or buyer never mention anything about cash, all trades are assumed to be non-cash related.

2. As for pure quickly spent, if you have any doubts, ask the seller yourself. Of course. I done it already, but you seem to have problem trusting what I wrote here, so you could probably double check with the seller yourself.