Price Suggestion
~1.39 ref
Unique Gaelic Golf Bag
230 votes up
83 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

"You're totally destroying the market with these proved prices. You're a maniac who will bring ruin to the delicate balance of the TF2 market" - Words of truth from Chewi.


Sold for 1.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20594419

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20767565


Sold for 1.55

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20487271


Sold for 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20890767

http://imgur.com/HjxHuLl


Conclusion: Before you say something stupid like "Not enough proof, downvote", take a look on the market first. This thing is so rare now. Demand > Supply because supply of craft hats went down and it's reasonable for this thing to rise. Don't counter prove me with 1.33 sellers and trade.tf, that's just plain stupid.

Feel free to counter / support my proofs.

    Oh, not enough proof, i guess.Okay, lets fiund sellers for 1.33 and giher again.

    http://www.trade.tf/price/30107/6/None - possible 1.44ref range(cuz you puted trade.tf screenshoot)

    1.33:

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20923450

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20890681 (bp.tf prices, but 1 day ago from the last bump)

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20832549 (bp.tf price, but 1 day ago from the last bump)

    If looking in Outpost more we can see more sellers for 1.33, wich unbumped 1 day ago.

    Baazars unbumped 1.33

    http://bazaar.tf/trade/861069

    http://bazaar.tf/trade/886931(freshly bumped 10 mins ago)


    So yeah, of reasons of shitload painted\collectors\craft numbers sellers its doesnt need 1.66 range.


      Are you blind or something?

      Make a key suggestion with the price of 8.44 with trade.tf as proof and receive people's love from that.

      http://bazaar.tf/trade/861069 Not in bp

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20832549 Not in bp


      Rest of your counter proof is young/badly bumped.

        I sayed about unbumped from like 1 day ago, if readed ofcourse

        http://bazaar.tf/trade/861069 - if you readed trade notes is says highest end of bp.tf's price(1.33 right now)

          I know it says high end of backpack.tf, I only said it was not in his backpack which means it is sold.

            Thanks for that, anyway its still can be counts like sold.

      No need to be harsh, just keep coolin'

      Lazaka gave 6 sellers at 1.33 flat;

      giang gave 5 solds at 1.44-1.66

      >> Proofs wise, at least a tie. Where supply is few, bp has been accepting several weird suggestions. IMHO.


      * I have been crafting bread makers ... have created around 50 of them and still around 10. Up until now I can always find 1.33 ref sellers I have been selling some 1.33 stuffs for 1.66 (after Mr. Giang successfully increased their price).

      * Increasing almost all items with rare supply at 0.33 higher ONLY by using 1 proof for higher ends .. very easy

      * As the moderators always say: common trading price. I don't think 1 sold for a common item is NOT a common trading price.

        1/ I wish I could keep coolin' but problem is that he went to 4 of my suggestions and the way he countered me is based on medium price of trade.tf. This is the most stupid thing I have ever seen. I even told him that before but he basically ignored it and kept doing the same thing.

        2/ Bazaar is not as popular as Outpost so it isn't a good place for selling normal items fast (and trade.tf doesn't update bazaar, too, making bazaar a less viable place to sell stuff with a low-price) => He only has 3 proof.

        3/ I don't have 1 sale at high-end. I have 2. Backpack classified sale is still a valid proof, I did it a ton of time.

        4/ 2/3 of his sellers are poorly bumped.

        5/ This item can be classified as uncommon items now. With only 2 pages on Outpost, no one can call it "common".

          2 Of Lazaka's sellers have sold (Not in backpack)

          Trade.tf link I don't know why he put that in there doesn't really prove anything.

          With only 3 links left, they are either badly bumped or young which mean it's bad counter proof.

            His logic is based on medium price of trade.tf, which is plain stupid to me.