- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19663196 - sold for 3 pure
Some fun facts about the anti-freeze nano...
There are 2 in existence, both are owned by collectors. There is only one valid sale of the anti-freeze nano in the past 3 months, and being that anti-freeze is a robo effect, I am allowed to price this unusual with one sale if sales are very scarce. The guy who bought the nano for 4 pure was a collector, and decided to crab his whole collection. He lost, and now the current owner is now collecting nano's, therefore the chances of an anti freeze nano ever coming to the market again is basically 0%.
that's all folks.
You should write a new season of Harry Potter :3
That's why u should not spycrab.
yeah, tell me about it. #lost4.5budscrabbing
Saw one sell for around $95 on the SCM within the last couple months. Almost bought it meself. Cool snory bro... Anyway upvote from me, thats right around 3 buds anyway.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20882643 3 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20700650 4 buds.. I don't think this is the sale you're talking about
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20882643 - so i see this seller at 3
But I'm not sure how you know the one you linked there sold for 3. Not seeing any evidence of that from bp.tf histories
Well, I see what happened now, which is why I had to close my last suggestion for this too. I originally priced this hat at 4, with the link I used in my suggestion. I than had people tell me that in fact that seller stated that he had sold that hat at 3, and not 4, but I see now that there are 2 sales, so maybe they were confused. Both sales look pretty similar, so I think I may have assumed they were the same sale. I made this suggestion when I just woke up yesterday, so I may have not been so clear minded.
Anywho, I'll re-suggest this with a range, like I did with the other suggestion. Sorry about this confusion.