If 8.5 got quicksold how can 8 be not considered an outlier?

first link, you have no idea when and if they changed their notes during that 2 months. With 2 rejected offers of 8 (2x) and 7.5 taking place in a couple weeks I'd say this suggestion isn't very good. Appears to be low-side biased.

this is a pretty unreasonable suggestion. so youve proved that this can get offers that fall within the current range, yet youre attempting to lower the price by 2 buds based off people quickselling?

I have rejected 8 buds on my duped one, so how could this range possibly be justified? I have honestly had a number of people add me for my price of 8.5 buds (3-4 people) yet because of how busy my life is right now, it's been days by the time ive got back to them and they have always found something else by then - people dont hold on to pure for long these days it seems. I feel my trade is poor proof on account of it having an obvious declined 8 bud offer, a number of willing buyers at my price (unfortunately i have no way of proving this), it features a duped hat, and i barely get time to bump it once a day.

from memory your first trade was also poorly bumped and if you look through the notes he/she was originally looking for 9.5, then 9, then declined an 8 bud offer but 2 days later accepted one. not a conventional quicksale but evidently a quicksale nonetheless as there was a maximum period of 2 days where they would have accepted an 8 bud offer.

All your other proof seems fine but those were the only trades supporting the lower end so i feel like this isnt adequate proof to lower the hat