Suggestion: Haunted Ghosts Tough Stuff Muffs at 277.5–333 keys

Price Suggestion

~52 keys

ghosts

85 votes up

3 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 17 Jul 14 21:04:37 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Solds -

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21041864 - GE Bonk Boy(15.5) + Stormy Yellow Belt(2.8) + SF Sticky(0.8)*0.9 - 17.1 ~17

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20684132 - Scorching Mancer(18.5*0.9) + 1.5 pure [thanks for the .5 I missed Jester] - 18.15 ~18

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19668387 - 15 pure

"Third time hopefully's the charm?"

Before a sad fuckup decision made on my part, Alaska wanted to 1:1 his beams sole mate with this hat. He also gave me the choice between that or his moon menco and a secret stahlhelm offer he got on it. I know this means little since they're only offers, but this range is downright laughable. That third trade was over two months ago. There is no way that price is anywhere relevent.

It's a 1 of 1, bp.tf rules say all sales below 3months are valid. And you kinda counter yourself. If the seconds sale is invalid, the price should be even lower.

Wait I thought the 3 month rule was for new hats/ effects? That is what I see the 3 month rule under. This is not a new hat or effect.

Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof; this does not mean that they are not useful. Feel free to include them to provide supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range.

Exceptions: For very rare hats, if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof to establish more data points. Keep in mind, new sales should take precedence over older ones.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

The hat has been sold more than 2 times in the past month

DID SOMEONE SAY GE BONK BOY

GIMME MAH DREAM HET PLS

Anyway, proof seems good to me, upboat!

Your dreams are shit.

On topic: Upvote as always.

I don't understand why the last one didn't get accepted when it had 91.4% of the vote. Is it really up to one person on what the price is? What is the point of voting if it can be shot down by one person. Apparently, this isn't a democracy.

Because the mancer suggestion got closed, and therfore my suggestion was incorrect. I was gonna close it myself but I was sleeping during that time.

His proof was based on an inaccurate listing... We evaluate each suggestion based on the proof provided. If the proof is inaccurate, it will be closed regardless of the votes.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52f074794cd7b85d518b4568 - 76%. Would you want a suggestion like this to be accepted. I have closed countless 100% suggestions where all the proof was based on duped hats when clean ones were selling for more.

Want a more subtle example?

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/53a7757d4cd7b858718b4a5e - 100% vote. Range is WAY off. 13-17. Look at the recent accepted suggestion at 18-21.

Evidence trumps all. But in close situations, I always go with the votes. And no, this is not a democracy. If it were, all your hats would be worth 1 key because voters always have a bias to drop hats.

Voters ALWAYS have a bias to drop hats? I don't agree with that. Got to have faith in the community. If it were a democracy I don't think people would vote to have 1 key hats.

Then explain the 76% vote on a suggestion to drop a hat to 2-3 keys. You want that passed by democracy? If they don't vote blindly to drop hats, they also vote blindly for any blue, purple, black belt suggester.