Suggestion: Bubbling Hat with No Name at 19–24.7 keys

Price Suggestion

~23 keys

bubbling

135 votes up

31 votes down

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 19 Aug 14 22:20:57 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

1 year old price and needs adjustment pretty badly.

Sales:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20268617[/url] Sold for NNB Company Man (priced at 1.4)

1.4 * 0.9 = 1.26 rounded to 1.3

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20845858[/url] Company sold here

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21263432[/url] Sold for an O. Fire Toque (Priced at 1.1 buds 3 months ago, barely flagged as outdated)

1.1 * 0.9 = 0.99 rounded to 1.0

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21775348[/url] Toque sold here

Notable Offers:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21786253[/url] Offered C9 Pugilist (Priced at 1.3 buds 3 months ago, same as Toque)

1.3 * 0.9 = 1.17 rounded to 1.2

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21593641[/url] Offered 1 bud pure

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21557603[/url] Another 1 bud pure offer

I needed to price this for a different suggestion, so why the heck not try updating the price?

Very well made price suggestion. Upvote from me. :)

I try my best :)

You need a mini on the toque, even more if you're using it for your low end.

[url]http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/[/url]

"Hats with an outdated price (>3 months old) are not valid proof." The toque is a 3 month old price. It is not > 3 months old, it is = 3 months old. Therefore, according to the guide forum for making unusual suggestions, the toque is still valid proof until it becomes 4 months old.

Lol no, it is outdated when its 3, or more months old. Simple as that

> ≠ ≥. It says >, you're saying ≥. Just sayin.

Man I have way more accepted suggestions than you, I know when an item is outdated and when it's not, even 2 months old prices are considered as outdated.

You're right, I'm inexperienced. I'm just pointing out what the admins wrote on the subject and how it contradicts what you are saying.