Suggestion: Overclocked Armored Authority at 53.2–60.8 keys

Price Suggestion

~38 keys

overclocked

65 votes up

78 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 21 Aug 14 19:28:42 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Beep Boop!

Please note that this is 1 of 2, Backpack.tf shows that there are only 2 such hats in existence

Bought the hat for 3.2 buds in overpay (Armored Authority Miami Nights hat "2.9 buds, the strange pan "8 keys" + 2 keys)

http://prntscr.com/4cbhjl - The trade contents

http://prntscr.com/4cbds9 - My backpack after the trade containing the Overclocked Armored Authority

http://prntscr.com/4cbf7s - My backpack when i had Unusual Armored Authority (Miami Lights)

http://prntscr.com/4cbds9 - His BP After the trade (Sold the pan)

http://prntscr.com/4cbfvo - His BP when he had the Overclocked Armored Authority

The low range:

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/53c007dd4cd7b8cb138b4568 this is still valid

(Please leave feedback)

Additional Comments

- the original price was too low considering the type of effect

- this is only 1 of 2 such hats so the effect is rare for this hat

- considering all other soldiers helmets (e.g., Soldiers Stash) the overclock effect is almost absent, so basically in the greater range of Soldiers hats the effect is even rarer

^^^^^^^^

Please don't. The effect, price and the relatability to other helmets mean nothing to the price.

What does "the low range - outpostlink" mean? Even if it sold for what your low range is, it's outdated. Downvote yet again.

That sale was 1 month ago, for it to become invalid it would need to have been 3 months

Wrong, 2 months is invalid. The sale is two months old, the SUGGESTION is 1 month old, the sale back then was a month old.

Multiple people have told me 3 months then its invalid

Name those people?

Mr. Bucket, Queyh, TheProcave

yes.

If sales are rare, 3 months are ok

2 months is fine. Even 3 months is fine if there's only been 2 sales in the past 3 months

Brush up on your rulez pl0x

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

I thought if it was a 1 of 1 sale, and only one sale occurred it was only then ok to use 2+ month sales,

"Exceptions: For very rare hats, if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof to establish more data points."

1-2 sales ;)

Funny how I say the same thing Necro said and I receive -2 votes for no reason xD

Wow this is your 4th suggestion trying to raise the price of this.

I've never really tried doing prices so i didnt really understand what i was doing the first couple times.

4th time is the charm.

I think 3.1 is more accurate than 3.2, but this is probably close enough.

You got my vote.

I'll have to downvote; honestly. Just because you paid 3.2 for it doesn't mean it's worth anymore than the price it's at. One sale might seem like enough proof considering there's only two...but, again, you're going by what -you- paid and not what others would pay and/or offer.

As there's only two recorded hats and sales are scarce, one sale would be 50% market representation for that item, and should still be considered, regardless of if it was purchased by the suggestion creator or not.

Sale is a sale. As much as I dislike pricing off new effects, the MN AA was recently priced.