Suggestion: Collector's Back Scatter at 19 keys

Price Suggestion

Collector's Back Scatter

Submitted Sat, 16 Aug 14 00:02:58 +0000 by ★ .Chris

60.41%

n/a

19 keys

~181 keys

206 votes up

135 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 21 Aug 14 20:18:23 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Hello mates, Trying for the second time

Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21859815 -B/O of 22 Keys.

Solds:

#1, 2 Weeks Ago.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21544736 - Sold after 5 days on STEAM MARKET.

Proof: http://i.imgur.com/Hze4Zx8.png -> 37.29€ (Received Only 32.4€)

http://i.imgur.com/zqwKP0j.png -> Keys were ~1.85€

Total : ~17.5 Keys (worth in money)

#2, 1 Day Ago.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21930414 - Sold after 3 days on STEAM MARKET.

Proof: http://i.imgur.com/d36fn9D.png -> 40.42€ (Received Only 35.15€)

http://i.imgur.com/2CIrRoE.png -> Keys were ~1.80€

Total : ~19.5 Keys (worth in money)

Suggested Value - 1 Earbud.

Help / Constructive Criticism / Additional Proof / Counter-Proof is ALWAYS welcome! >;3

You can't base your suggestion on SCM sales only

Oh, then i fucked up :(. I'll try the third time when i get other proofs)

Here I can help you with one trade for 1bud. Wasn't made yet. 199 in the set + 1 weapon.

My trade http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21883456

trade history doesn't show 199 weapons in the set though http://i.imgur.com/hmL2F0V.jpg

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198123911987?time=1407826800

Your backpack a bit before the sale shows the amount of Back Scatters you stated in the ad + 2 more. I think it could be well-assumed the quantity in the kit lined up with what you stated in the ad.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198002962970?time=1407998422

...and your buyer definitely has a Collector's Back Scatter originating from the date you sold the kit, though it's been professionally-killstreaked now.

Looks like your proof checks out. :) On another note, that's a lot of Back Scatters that you had... o.O

:) yeah it was quite an endeavour

Thanks for adding this. Saved the suggestion.