This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed
by Horizon.
There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value.
However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked
in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
One year old sale, really?
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
Well, this must get updated
Sellers:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22006399 (1.4 buds)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17895345 (30 keys)
Solds:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21717916 (Stormy metal slug) No price atm but was 1.5-2.0 buds before
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21203326 (Sold for 25)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13461493 (Sold for 1.5 buds)
Your 1.5 bud sale is a year old.
As stated, the Stormy Slug is unpriced.
So you have one valid sale at ~1.3 (25 / 19 = 1.315, which rounds to 1.3, not 1.4.)
Downvote unless you get some proof that's actually valid.
EDIT: Oh, man, I'm signed in as my brother.
This is MaGenta / Gent, hi guys :P
Also, disliking my comments won't make the truth go away, it just makes you look immature.
The truth can hurt...
But down-voting comments won't do crap.
I wasnt the guy who gave you a dislike.. be sure about one thing about arguing about it mate.
You probably should have been sure of the rules before you made this suggestion, too.
Looks like we're both in the red.
And anyway, it's not like it wasn't the logical conclusion.