Suggestion: Poisoned Shadows Horrific Headsplitter at 551–608 keys

Price Suggestion

~440 keys

shadow

40 votes up

67 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Hello everyone, Oh no I have the hat! Before downvote, lets take a look at my proof?

Solds- http://imgur.com/VNaXAMI,Zj0CnaZ,xP8kPH9#2

Sold along side a OverClocked Broadband Bonnet(Mini, 1.5 b/o on outpost. And an offer of 1. Rounding to just a flat 1 for saftey., and Professional killstreak Backburner(Last sold for 12.65 on market. Which after taxes rounds down to 4 keys from 4.3) for a Burning flames bonk boy(33.5)-Marking this sale at about 32 buds. Rounded.

The next sale is what I purchased it for.

I paid a clean GBH Team captain(30)

With him adding a P fetti Heavy Rag as sweets(17 keys, keeping this because current on market b/o is 19. So minor difference.)

Which would make this sale at around 29 buds.

http://imgur.com/tqkpX1y

Any feedback is appreciated.

You're basing your bonnet's mini on a B/O? Also you forgot to apply overpay on both sales

And an offer, its a rarer hat that seems harder to price.

It's an offer, yeah. Did you know that buyers always lowball? I can offer 2 ref on your headsplitter, doesn't mean that's its price.

It is a third gen robo hat. + his b/o is of 1.5 and the current price on the honcho is 1 bud. So guessing the price it would sell for isn't much greater. You are just throwing it out of proportion :P

Man he's offering a cheaper hat, this would count if he accepts the offer OR the unusual offered wasn't cheaper than the bonnet, also why didn't you apply overpay in both of your sales? rather than disliking my comments?

Lmao, getting dislikes for saying what is correct, idiots are everywhere.

http://i.imgur.com/6gxQMAN.png

an older sale,but still in his favor

Dat free unusual.

You appear to have not applied unusual overpay.

plz fix linkz

Link fixed. Enjoy.

You have to multiply both sales by 0.9

Bonk Boy was duped.

First sale was 33.5 [Bonk] * 0.9 [due to it being duped] = 30.2 - 1 [broadband] = 29.2 - 0.2 [Backburner] = 29 * 0.9 [overpay] = 26.1

Second sale was 29.5 [TC] - 0.9 [Rag] = 28.6

26-29 would do fine, if you want me to resuggest for you, let me know.

edit: fixed it

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22219978

splitter was offered.

no overpay

Lemme check and see if the duped forum thread has a price for the bonk a sec, Just multiplying by 0.9 isn't really adequate.

DUPED BURNING BONK BOY ~26-30

http://www.tf2outpos.../trade/19092699 - cauldron crones - 26

http://www.tf2outpos.../trade/19138902 - looks like it was 23 pure?

http://www.tf2outpos.../trade/19579867 - duped PE bonk boy + beams CM + max + 2 ~30 (b/o was 30)

http://www.tf2outpos.../trade/19543503 - duped harvest modest ?

http://www.tf2outpos.../trade/19448627 - http://backpack.tf/p...time=1398582000 - ~27

Duped Bonk is 28.

polars cheat sheet, easy way to do it.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

should have applied 32.5 * 0.88 = 28.6, .5 off

thanks for the supporting proof tho

Yeah, that's FROM the cheat sheet XD

We have the duped price thread for accuracy.

From the cheat sheet:

Unpriced/gifted/duped hats - do not assume prices or take a fixed subtraction based off the clean versions of hats.

the latter was introducted before the duping thing that was instated.

Citing what as precedence?

the most recent revisal re: the topic at hand, being the duping overpay type thing.

Huh, I completely missed that addendum to the cheat sheet.

Fair play, I'm man enough to admit my mistake XD

Hmm. To reduce something by 9.8%, you'd multiply by 0.92.

Which puts the Bonk at 30.82.

Nut sure this new rule (which, even Polar states, is a 'work-in-progress;), should be levied as cold hard proof though.

26-31 might be better on that duped Bonk, even.

it says hats >20 buds, 12%

I understand that, but it's a good estimate from what I've seen so far though.

I think that was raw data, and that we're supposed to be using the blanket 9.8, no?

That's the main guideline, anyway.

But whatever, I'm clearly clueless when it comes to this XD

unsure, that might be the case.

it's rather confusing, needs some simplification.

Could you? XD Please.

You need to mini the outdated unusuals fully, and you need to apply unusual overpay.

As dezi has stated, 26 flat, or 26-29 based on the fact the 'splitter was offered, would be best, much more appropriate.