Suggestion: Mann Co. Supply Crate #17 at 0.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~46.06 ref

#17

121 votes up

57 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Wed, 27 Aug 14 22:48:03 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

{RESUGGEST}

This is nowhere close to 1 scrap.

Solds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22216763#latest - My trade, sold 1 for 1 refined. proof: http://i.imgur.com/y4f295d.png - please note there is few #16 crates that being sold for 1 ref each, so just ignore it, there is #17 sold for a ref. - otulier probably...

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20971195 - sold 178 for 0.33

Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22273608 - Selling for a scrap, not bumed well, and VERY YOUNG, like 3 hours.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21831323 - 1.66 ref.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20971195 - Selling 5, Sold 178 for 1 rec.

Feedback will help.

He sold 178, and he still got 5 in stock, so yeah ...

For them to be used as a good entry in your sold list, it may be worth trying to get supporting proof for their sales. Taking their claim at face value still leaves the information fallible.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22273608 -- Confirmed as sold for 1 scrap.

Sold within a few hours.

@OP, try found quickbuyers to disprove the range here since there's a bunch of people who have doubts. GL!

Indeed. With their sellers list shrinking from people purchasing at the advertised cost, if they're able to show that and/or show proof for the mass seller, this suggestion would be bulletproof.

I don't really care it's just Crates! Nobody even wants Crates!

I and my 922 crates disgree.

Crates are love.

Crates are life.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21831323 -- Confirmed as sold for 1.66 ref.

Thats a outlier just as my 1 ref sold, there is just TOO MANY solds at 0.33, and if you can check my last suggestion, people told me to resuggest with 0.33 flat,without range to 1.

It's clear that it's an outlier, but if it's possible to sell at 1.66, then surely .33 ref is possible. All I'm doing is updating the status of your listed proof.

I had also looked at your previous suggestion shortly after finding this one, and making my first comment.

Allright, thanks for the extra tho

Not a problem. :)