Price Suggestion
~37 keys
sunbeams
Unusual Respectless Robo-Glove Sunbeams
90 votes up
24 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

    "Two sales are required to establish a range on unpriced hats. If the two sales are discrepant, a third sale is required to determine the outlier. ."


    Exception 2: Rare Hats

    Any hat can be priced based on a single sale if ALL these criteria are met:

    - There are no other recent sales in the last 3 months

    - The effect is not a summer 2013 effect. (robo, 2013 halloween effects can be used as they are often rarely traded and rarely unboxed)

    - The hat went to a collector or person who intends to keep the hat. A collector can be identified by looking at the person's trade history, item history of similar unusuals in the backpack OR if the owner has not resold the hat 1 month after the sale occurred.


    Please assess if this unusual meets this criteria, thanks.

      Yeah I read those, and it does:


      - There are no other recent sales in the last 3 months

      -> it's new, check.

      - The effect is not a summer 2013 effect. (robo, 2013 halloween effects can be used as they are often rarely traded and rarely unboxed)

      ->Sunbeams is first gen, right? Check.

      - The hat went to a collector or person who intends to keep the hat. A collector can be identified by looking at the person's trade history, item history of similar unusuals in the backpack OR if the owner has not resold the hat 1 month after the sale occurred.

      ->I collect Respectless Robo-Gloves (retarded, I know): http://steamcommunity.com/id/shlaeNg


      Thanks though. :)

        Alright, good ^^

        Upvoting

        My reply to Dezi:

        "Just telling the suggester to make sure it does fit that criteria. I didnt have my own time to do so, so just in case ^^"

        I don't get your point, it does.

          yes i think this is a correct statement


            Just telling the suggester to make sure it does fit that criteria. I didnt have my own time to do so, so just in case ^^

          screenshot of the trade would be better

          Nice upvote for proof :D