Suggestion: Kill-a-Watt Data Mining Light at 32.3–38 keys

Price Suggestion

~13 keys

kill-a-watt

57 votes up

124 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 04 Sep 14 22:09:05 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I beleive that this price range should not be too much lower than TW, the only proof I have is that one of the owners right now is wanting 2 buds pure for it, which is the only one on outpost/bazaar/steam market atm. The owner before him sold it for 1.7 pure. Trade offer closed.

PREVIOUS OWNER: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22308769

CURRENT OWNER: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22414135

inb4 proof needed

it was sold for Orbiting Fire Tyrantium Helmet by the previous owner. The current owner of the hat tells me that he added sweets (quite a bit) on his offer because the previous owner insisted that the prices for the hat and the rarity would affect future trades. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22308769

You need to show proof of the trade in order to price it.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22414135 Current Owner

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22308769 Previous Owner

Not that a trade occurred, but the specifics of the trade. For example, a link to the buyer and sellers backpacks before and after the trade, showing exactly what was traded. Or, you could talk to the previous or current owner and get them to take a screen shot of their trade history. Either one will suffice for providing proof of a trade.

matching up item history from outpost works too

You need to provide proof of 2 sales, before you can price an unpriced unusual, and while yes he did say he sold it for a Orbiting Fire Tyrantium Helmet, First the Orbiting Fire Tyrantium Helmet is only 1.5-1.6 buds, you didn't apply overpay. The current seller does not count either, you can't base it on b/o

And as for the rarity its a robohat with a 3rd gen effect lol

It's the only one you can find on the market, if you wanted it or not. I dont see anyone else selling it atm, Many more out there, but none for trade

I have no idea where you're pulling 1.7 pure from or your high end

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/ read this for more info on how to do unusual suggestions

1.7 from tyrantium

you can't say something sold for "1.7 pure" when it wasn't sold for pure.

Proof needed

I'm saying the price should be selling for 2 pure.. The 2 pure is not because the guy is selling it, it's because the current owner told me that he sold it, afterward previous owner wanted a base amount of sweets. I wouldn't be making this price bogus, I dont even have the hat..

if u dont have more than 2 sales - dont make suggestion

you can price an unusual off of sales lol

and edvis is saying you need sales to price an unusual...

what both of you are missing is that there are circumstances in which one sale is ok

you can still price an unusual with one sale

" there are circumstances in which one sale is ok" -me about unusual suggesting

my comment before was to point out that edvis had said you need "sales" to price an unusual, and that you "lol"ed at it and told him you can price an unusual with sales which is redundant :|

there are circumstances in which you have to price with 2+ sales

im just saying there are situations when you can price with one sale

lol

that's not the point *sigh* your comments are ending up redundant since you're just reiterating things that have already been said :/

anyways I see the disliking has hit this suggestion hard

Yeah I lol'd at that a little bit.

Need proof