Price Suggestion
~13 keys
o.fire
Unusual Respectless Rubber Glove Orbiting Fire
150 votes up
11 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Whatever, I don't own one anyways.

Wish evilclone did though

Doing a key range because a bud range would just screw this thing's price for now.


Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22625967 1 Bud, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22531460 17 Keys, two weeks unsold(Look at his relists)


Solds:

Sold for an Orbiting Planets Frenchman's Beret + Minor sweets(~8 ref)(15 Keys with Overpay)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198118475250?time=1404802800 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198118475250?time=1404889200


Sold for a Blizzardy Storm Grimm Hatte(18 Keys with Overpay, Outlier)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198108977083?time=1406803885 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198108977083?time=1407049200


Sold for 15 Keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198065683874?time=1407135600 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198065683874?time=1407279687


Sold for a BMOC(11 Keys with Overpay) + 8 Keys(19 Keys total, Outlier)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198118475250?time=1403679600

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20703332


Added 2 Keys in Sweets for Green Confetti Ze Googles(19 Keys, offered)(17 Keys total)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22601092


Seems to have sold for 15 Keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22157371

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14530807 Quickbuyer's Trade


15 Keys is common, though the fact that this sells for more can't be ignored. Making 18 and 19 into outliers because of the two sellers at 17, but acknowledging them to enforce 17 being in the range. 15-17 Should be fine.


Additional Proof/Counter-Proof/Constructive Criticism/Feedback is always appreciated.

    why are you againts a bud range.


    specifically 0.9-1.1

    edit: this went to keys just cuz of them random key update just now

      Most of the pure trades have been done in keys. And when the bud value rises again, these hats would fluctuate.

        the blizz grimm

        the planets beret

        the g. fetti goggles


        all have bud values. would be unfair this hat gets stuck with a key value

        by your reasoning all hats should be valued in key value


        0.9 would currently inculde the 15 key sales (which went fast,beret sale)

        it would have a median of 1 bud (fetti goggles,unsolds at 1 bud)

        and a high of 1.1 (blizz grimm,bmoc + 8 keys)

          Earbuds are fluctuating in price, all those hats were priced BEFORE the fluctuation.

          The price would be completely messed up if buds should fall again, deviating from the hat's true price.

          Also, "all have bud values. would be unfair this hat gets stuck with a key value"

          Accurate pricing >[power gap]> opinion.

            so this hat got traded 1:1 with a planets beret (1 for simplicty sake) when buds were 25 keys (just to make my point)

            1 * 0.9 * 25 =23 keys


            BUT since buds are 17 keys now,we use that

            1 * 0.9 * 17 = 15 keys


            your logic would make a hats worth dependable on the time it was priced