Price Suggestion
The Nunhood
Submitted by 5C
~6.05 ref
Unique Nunhood
270 votes up
173 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed by Puddilicious.

There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value. However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I bought one for 4 about 40 minutes ago

    Just sold one for 3.66

    U need 4.33 unsold

      sold for 1 key with 4 ref return when keys were 8.55-8.66 http://gyazo.com/ff851068e24a66ca6190546a6995db85

        classifieds have 5 at 4 ref right now. he also doesn't need unsolds since 4.33 is still in the range. up vote

          did you see the counterproof

            do you see the classifieds? at this moment if i wanted to buy a nun hood at 4 ref i could. 4 should be in the range since 4 happens frequently even if it happens fast.

              there are only five 4ref sellers on the classifieds... that's not many :| go check plax's comment please. also, classifieds are really not the best proof, only valid as support :<

                5 is enough. i can get one for 4 ref at any time. thats important. if the people who use the site for trading are going against the current price then that tells you something about the price.

            Classified actually have only two and one is very poorly bumped. Classified does not get automatically updated once the item sells. Either seller have to manually close them or someone has to visit their backpack.

              it had 5 when that comment was posted

                All got quicksold. As you can see. The reason they stayed there is because like I said...The seller did not delete the listing manually or nobody visited the seller's backpack.

                but considering their are now 0 in the classifieds i have changed my vote

                edit: also good counter proof