Suggestion: Green Energy Timeless Topper at 36.85–63.65 keys

Price Suggestion

~28 keys

g.nrg

65 votes up

54 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sun, 05 Oct 14 05:20:09 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Only 1 Existing in the world

Solds:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198065372897?time=1407567600 - 4 Buds (Burning Snaggle)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198065372897?time=1410073200 - 21.5 Keys in Items (1 Bud & 3 Keys in Items G. Energy Timeless Topper) (Probably taken as 3 buds) - 4.2 (Buds) [3.8 with overpay applied]

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198049003607?time=1412146800 - 2.4 Buds [2.2 With Overpay Applied]

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198049003607?time=1412233200

Other Sales:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198062339837?time=1409727600 - Sold for a Roboactive Timeless Topper (No Price)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198062339837?time=1409986800

range seems much too wide?

Only one in the world sold 5 times, (Two I've looked at this history I still have no idea what it sold for)

irrelevant response, 1 of 1 doesn't mean you can have a range that's too wide :u you can use offers to determine which end is an outlier :<

2.2 would be the outlier here

"21.5 Keys in Items (1 Bud & 3 Keys in Items G. Energy Timeless Topper) (Probably taken as 3 buds) - 4.2 (Buds) [3.8 with overpay applied]"

The math there doesn't look right: shouldn't you remove the sweets before applying the overpay? You even concluded that "it was probably taken as 3 buds"

he shouldn't be removing the sweets from the overpay calc. if they were in items I think. obviously no overpay calc. on any pure

I didn't explain well, although if you actually checked the trade you would have understood in a second.

The Topper, which is the one he is pricing, has been offered with another unusual and few sweets (which he valued 21.5 keys or 1 bud and 3 keys, 1 bud is the other unusual and the 3 keys are the random hats) on the burning Snaggletooth which is 4 bud.

So the price of the Topper should be the difference between the burning Snaggletooh 4 bud and 1 bud and 3 keys (should be 2.8 or so) . Instead he is valuating the topper 4.2 buds, then calculating overpay and pricing it at 3.8.

Ummm No.

I'm not valuing the topper at 4.2 buds, I'm valuing the whole trade as 4.2 buds and valueing the topper for 3 buds. Learn to read.

so why is the high end 3.8 in the suggestion if you valued it 3 buds in this trade? XD

... I'm just gonna stop responding since you have no idea what you're talking about.

actually, you said this:

21.5 Keys in Items (1 Bud & 3 Keys in Items G. Energy Timeless Topper) (Probably taken as 3 buds) - 4.2 (Buds) [3.8 with overpay applied]

you said that the topper was taken as 3 buds then you say the sale was at 3.8? wut? (3.8 would be the value of the snaggle in that case)

Oh crap now I see the error, I took the whole trade instead of the item.