- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Hello :D
---
Only 4 trade in Outpost :O
---
TF2 Outpost
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22996974 = 0,66-1
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22664594 = 0,66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22908537 = not sure
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22864451 = not sure
Bazaar.tf
http://bazaar.tf/trade/1050972 = 1
http://bazaar.tf/trade/799914 = maybe 0,66 (whitout the paint)
...
Counter-Proof =
http://bazaar.tf/trade/591425 = bp.tf price (9 months ago) :/
http://bazaar.tf/trade/382820 = bp.tf price (11 mounths ago) ://
This item is useless, but logic<proof
need sales
why the hell are you showing counter proof?
Why not? Otherwise those was sold out.
Bazaar trades can be modified at any moment, the time on them wouldn't be relevant, they're still selling for normal price though
You need sales.
Hello.
Your first link is iffy since no price is actually given.
Your second link is valid sort of. It's poorly bumped.
Your third link is also iffy since no price is given and it's poorly bumped.
Your fourth link is quickselling for 0.33
The first bazaar link is still really young (<24 hours) and is an outlier (outside of your suggested range)
THe second link hasn't bumped in 4 months and it's painted, you don't count painted items.
Even aside from this, you have no solds at 0.44, 0.55 or 0.66 to justify raising the price.
Unless you find these sales to justify your range, downvote.
First link: Use mathematics
Secound link: Invalid? Not for me O.o (http://snag.gy/ZelFd.jpg)
Third link: he is not sure
Fourt link: true
First link is an implication; that's like assuming an item sold in an outpost trade just because the trader closed the trade.
Second link: I'm going to repeat it since you didn't understand what I said. It's poorly bumped, not that it isn't in your range, that's why I said it's sort of valid.
Third link - that's up to him to decide and up to us to wait and see.
You still have no solds, my vote is unchanged.
He sell this item for 0.66 ref, it doesn't meter how many times he use tf2outpost.
Actually, it does matter because it shows how active the seller wants sell his items.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22664594 = 0,66
Clicking on the bump date, the trade hasn't been active for 4 days, clearly showing that the seller is inactive or that the trade is outdated (Outpost trades closes in a week without a recent bump, the trade is already over half a week). "He sell this item for 0.66 ref, it doesn't meter...", but do you think he will respond back after not updating that trade?
lol, I wasn't even backpack.tf.
I didn't dislike your comment.
Fact of the matter is that you still have no solds.
Disliker -.-'
lol. Don't get mad at me just because:
a. you don't know how to write proper suggestion.
b. I provided valid counter proof.
No one click that 1.66 ref link; it leads to a trade offer, which doesn't help you and is unnecessary.
Reviewing your Suggestion:
- Do not include Painted items selling at higher than the current, the value varies depending on what the seller thinks (not just using math logic and subtracting the value of the paint).
- The "Not Sure" links, if you don't know what they are selling for, then its best to leave them out since it doesn't support your suggestion (basically, they are pointless unless someone written an offer in the comments).
- The "Counter Proof", why are you putting up evidence that goes against your own suggestion, do you want your suggestion to pass or fail?
- Majority of your sellers are outdated/inactive
- The core problem, you have no solds to prove why the price should raise. Sellers alone isn't enough (they can support your sales but otherwise, they could be seen as high-ballers). Out of all this, you only have one seller at 0.66, yet you pulled the range from 0.44 out of nowhere without giving a reason.