Actually, it makes perfect sense. He's counter-proving his own new price by listing UNSOLDS at 7 ref when he's trying to state the highest amount people will buy for is 7 ref, but he's basically stating that people won't buy them if they're 7 ref. Also, i'm implying that he's making the price SEEM to be in need of a lower price based off of his proof, not that it should be generally, but again, he's counter-proofing himself. If he wants the price to be 7 ref, he needs to show the unsolds above 7 ref and not at 7 ref.