Suggestion: Dead Presidents Cadaver's Cranium at 13–14 keys

Price Suggestion

~6 keys

210 votes up

33 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 25 Oct 14 01:20:14 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The price is old and needs to fixed:

CLASSIFIEDS (13-14 keys)

[url]http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?tradable=1&craftable=1&item=Cadaver%27s%20Cranium&quality=5&particle=60[/url]

SELLERS - (probably) SOLDS (12-14 keys)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23130226[/url] - 12.5 keys SOLD

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23173446[/url] - 14 keys SOLD

UNSOLDS

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22866388[/url] - 15 keys [3 weeks old]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22872426[/url] - ~bud [3 weeks - UNSOLD]

CURRENTLY NOT SOLD

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23209135[/url] - 12 keys (1 day old)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23165587[/url] - 14 keys (4 days old)

Some sellers claim that they "quicksell', but this is not a QS actually. The price was old and there is no way that this is the real price of this hat.

Sellers, unsolds, currently not solds?

Anyways you need to figure out what they actually sold for if you have any sales, can't just assume something sold for the B/O.

i have noticed that nowadays, potential buyers tend to add the person rather than just reply to the trade post with the offer. So, most times, it is not possible to find out what the hat was sold for.

Based on the B/O (and item history) we can have a slight implication about the actually price.

This is an adjusted price, because the current one is unreal and can lead to serious misapprehension!

Its entirely possible, you just have to do some actual research. Try and figure out when it sold and look at scans of their backpack on this site and that is usually a very clear indicator of what something sold for.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

Well, i tried and did some research before posting!

Thanks for the feedback, i will try to organize my proof better next time!