- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
The Last suggestion made by Short Circuit is incorrect.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22447588 - The sale was really for the Vivid Hong Kong Cone + 4 pure
17.5 x .9 = 15.75 rounding to 15.8 + the 4 pure = 19.8 rounding it to 20 for this reason "For hats 15-50 buds, rounding to the nearest 1 buds is reasonable"
B/O set was 20 pure / 25 in unusuals.
http://imgur.com/ez6msN3 - screenshot of the sale.
During the time of the sale the Vivid HCK was NOT outdated, Thank you for pointing that out, dr1ftec.
Thank you Steecatsy for providing the screenshot.
How is it incorrect
Tell me if this makes sense: 1 Sale, but yet... a range was made.
where do you see a range?
He was asking why the previous suggestion by Short Circuit was incorrect. Wasn't referring to your price.
Polar said it was fine.
There is no need to make this.
That shouldn't matter, the guy in the suggestion gave me permission to re-suggest it with the correct price. He asked me to do the math for him, and I asked if he was giving me permission to re-suggest.
But after that polar told him to leave it as it is. Cos due to negative rep he couldn't resuggest.
And you're opening another suggestion even though you've seen polar's comment
I don't understand what the problem is with having a correct suggestion, in the cheat guide thing that polar made, if the hat is worth between 15 - 50 buds, you're suppose to round up to the nearest bud.
The main problem goes here, in the bold text below:
"Well, you should have just suggested at 20 flat. But you can't make a new suggestion since you have negative rep now. Just leave this up. It's fine
polar · posted about 6 hours ago · Score: 4"
I can't see any reason to ignore polar and to disrespect the seller who came here to correct the price.
Ok, and he gave me permission to resuggest before polar said that.
http://i.gyazo.com/17af6ab65d32089a93549891c042bb88.png
Why is he talking about a range then..?
I have no clue. I'm completely clueless, just as much as you are.
it was you, you said there was a range :/ or are you talking about the other open suggestion at 19.8 - 20?
I was meaning the other suggestion, mate. There was no point of that range.
I know, that's why I'm taking on the permissions of resuggesting.
Hence, why I agree with your proof more than the other suggestion.
he didnt include the pure :/
My bad, I took Dobroslav Augustin's proof without double checking it.
It's ok, human error, just looking for a correction now :)
Just a direct link to the screenshot just in case. http://i.imgur.com/ez6msN3.png?1