Price Suggestion
~4.05 keys
Unique Forgotten King's Restless Head
19 votes up
90 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

i think this item should be classified for the people who are in distress that it has no price

if you look at the last to people who were selling the item the latest was 2.66 (so it's going down) and the one before that was 3 ref which i think is a fair price for this hat. i also have a link to some outpost trades, they are selling for 4 ref or up but less people will pay more then 4 ref for this hat (i think).

link: http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Forgotten%20King%27s%20Restless%20Head&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1

outpost link:http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23523953

Not enough proof, downvote.

    Opinions are not proof. "I think..." is not going to work. You need sucessful sales at that range. Also, broken link


    You might want to take a look at this to help you with future price suggestions http://backpack.tf/help/suggestions

        I smell stubbornness.


        The jist of it; You have no proof, this is going to fail, GL mate, you don't have any.

            Look at my suggestions. Now look at yours. Do you see the difference?


            18 links per suggestion for a normal item vs 1 broken link and 1 useless link.


            And uneccessary swearing? You are just asking for a ban.

              it's not swearing if you see i didn't say the word i either used a different letter or made it a *

              and i don't give a **** about your suggestion's they may as well be the same as mine, especially since this is my second ever suggestion!

                Your 'Second suggestion ever' is not justifiable for the fact you won't listen to Regular suggestors.


                Close this now, or you'll just dig yourself deeper.

                  I would advise you not to start a flame war here.

                    Doesn't matter if you starred a swear out, the rule is not for swearing, it's for offensive conduct.

                    That counts as offensive conduct.


                    If you're not going to listen to feedback, this is not the place for you.

                  It's 5:30 in the morning where I am, and I still haven't slept yet, so this reply is just for you, Brizlightning. <3


                  Either you are crass, didn't read the rules, a troll, or all of the above, so let me tell you what's wrong with your suggestion.


                  First off, for an item that has four pages of listings in the Outpost, you can't just tell us to look at the classifieds (which works as SUPPORTING evidence, not the main bulk) and an Outpost link. No, you have to gather up as MANY sales as you possibly can of this item, at the price point you're suggesting at the moment.


                  Giving a price just because, "i think this item should be classified for the people who are in distress that it has no price" is a MOTIVE, NOT relevant to the suggestion.


                  God, the only redeeming factor is that you seem to know what an outlier is, but take a look at other suggestions man!

                  GOOD NIGHT.

                    ...wat?

                    Btw, u need sales.

                      mean just plain mean mate go take your negative attitude away from my profile or i'll -rep you

                You are suggesting the price. You provide all the proof needed to convince the mods to accept this.

                  ik i'm new and had issues with the internet since i live right next to bushland so i couldn't get all the sites and since it hasn't been classified i think it is enough evidence to prove that it needs a price, and like i said second time ever doing a suggestion!

                    no offense to you but there is no excuse to skip the rules, you need sales of this to prove the most common trading point therefore classifieds is definitely not enough on it's own (selling=/=sold)

            classifieds should only be used as support proof