- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Hello, unique bill's are going down, this might go down too :3
Classifieds at the time of making http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Bill%27s%20Hat&quality=3&tradable=1&craftable=1
20 keys (x1)
22 keys (x1)
23 keys (x3)
Sellers below 23 keys/1.5 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23561218 (20)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23593299 (21)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23520534 (22 + 8 ref)
Unsolds at 23 keys/1.5 buds/backpack.tf price
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23346833
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22062490
Many sellers of vintage bills on outpost are looking for more than 23 keys, so I didn't include them in the range
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23561218 - gifted
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23593299 - young
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23520534 - painted and with spell
Painted w/ spell is fine as an unsold if it's below current price.
And we'll see where the young one goes. I think that's the clincher here.
wouldn't that count as 1.5 buds though?
so he doesn't really have any valid proof for 1.4 buds
Hmm. You're kinda right.
Does depend where that young seller goes, but even then, one seller is iffy.
1.45-1.5 could be doable, but that seems arbitrary.
Sale closed after four days, not reposted.
Should not go down , it should go up since not a lot of people have it. Should be like 2 ~ 3.33 buds due to the number of people who has a Vintage Bill's Hat
Proof > logic > opinion
Coincidence [Y.A] Ñø† √îkks†år_123? You have one -_-
I just sold my Black Painted Bill's Hat for 219 ref pure
You're pretty much right, I always see prices. UNDER 1.5 buds on tf2 outpost or bazaar.tf
there are only 1700 of these in tf2. these should be going up if anything
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54685266b98d88172c8b484a additional proof here