- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Another suggestion from Bile? Immediate downvote! He has two, downvote!Re-suggesting yet AGAIN with new proof.
Sold for 2.33: http://i.imgur.com/MQDqhwC.png (This should be considered an outlier)
Young trade that sold for 1.33: http://i.imgur.com/uJQc0yT.png
Several screenshots proving a 1.66 sell.
Mask still in backpack: http://i.imgur.com/K4erAvc.png
Note the metal count: http://i.imgur.com/kSJ65Oc.png
Now count the metal difference: http://i.imgur.com/Ii8PpSn.png
A 1.88 difference. Thomas confirmed he did sell his mask for 1.66, but he also traded something else for .22, explaining the 1.66 sell.
Thomas's Trade: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23503666
Last but not least a young trade that I saw and immediately bought: http://i.imgur.com/iJMwStN.png
Proof from Blue Rain:
Couple recent sales:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23504325 - 1.22
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23471209 - 1.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23503666 - 1.66
All of these sold very quick.
Proof from ThaQsforfun:
Additional sellers:
1.77: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23577710
1.33: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23584628
Proof from Jenson:
dont have to find anything, you posted yourself tons of 1.66 or less
currently on classifieds 1 for 2 ref and 3 for 1.88 or less
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23592390 - 1.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23611862 - 1.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23597909 - 2 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23611998 - 2 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23433004 - 2 ref
thats literally all of OP ones, rest of them have no price/no offer
Conclusion: After a lot of negativity... and some proof countering my old suggestion, I'll resugest yet again. After much more proof, people started suggesting that 2.33 was simply and outlier. I too started agreeing with that after I saw the proof, and here I am with a new suggestion.
Dem spaces tho
:P Everyone always tells me to space out my links. I'm too scared to put them any closer, since too many spaces is beter than too little :D
How. How does my comment get hidden when his gets liked. I'm not insulting you butt, but (lol butt and but?) really do you people hate me that much?
I personally don't, but that seems to be the general consensus around these parts
Ah ok, there are 4 dislikes on my comment, and 4 likes on his. Makes PERFECT sense.
Must you take it so personally?
Backpack.tf in a nutshell
Butt's unnessecary comment gets 39 likes, and when pibus of bile answers why he puts all the spaces he gets 20 dislikes.
^ backpack.tf's community is kind of an ass sometimes.. We just want likes and to then be able to list items. damn you all!
( ง ͡°╭͜ʖ╮͡° ) ง( ง ͡°╭͜ʖ╮͡° ) ง( ง ͡°╭͜ʖ╮͡° ) ง gaben is ruler of steam!!!
Why did the 1.66-2.33 ref suggestion close?
Well... proof is good upvote.
Look at the old suggestion. More proof showed that the 2.33 was just an outlier.
Oh. Ok. This works anyways.
http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Saxton%20Hale%20Mask&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1
3x 1.22
outpost:
1.22 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23651027
1.33ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23626829
1.44ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23651792
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23652446
Conclusion: it is easy to buy 1.33ref
All sold quickly, that's why the price needs to be raised.
sold quickly ? all unsold for 1.22/1.33/1.44
I do not think this vote is valid.. sorry man
Correction:
1.22 sold
1.33 sold
First 1.44 link is quite young
Second one is also VERY young and hasn't been bumped.
http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Saxton%20Hale%20Mask&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1
3x 1.22 and unsold....
maybe the range 1.33-1.66 would be correct
Make that 1 unsold that hasn't been bumped for 3 hours...
http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Saxton%20Hale%20Mask&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1
1x 1.05 ref
1x 1.11 ref
1x 1.33 ref
First one hasn't been bumped in 7 hours\
There is no 1.11
Both the 1.33s are young.
I again repeat to, range 1.33-1.66 likely to be accepted. is very easy to find sellers by 1.33 ref
Why do you keep putting links to classifieds? They aren't proper proof
one of the few halloween items not dropping. good proof = upvote
Maybe I'm just missing something, but where's the proof for 2 ref? I don't see any sales @ 2 ref itself.
Scroll all the way down mate.
This one didn't sell at 2 ref. It's still in backpack.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23433004
Many reasons why. Could have closed the trade because he wanted to keep it. Ask him for info.
Whatever the reason is, it shows that it isn't sold.
Face palm. He could have not want to sell it and closed the trade. If you have proof that shows he didn't just close it because he didn't want it I'd happily suggest closing this.
He's right, it hasn't sold (still in his backpack) and the other sellers at 2 ref were quicksells (both trades closed < a day)
There goes went high-end.
Perhaps a resuggestion at 1.33-1.66? Or a flat 1.66.
I can't believe how hard it is not to insult you... people. Read, then reconsider your comment.
Read what exactly? The part where you offer invalid proof for 2.00 ref or did I miss something?
Go ahead, insult me.
Yes, I should go back to preschool because I'm the one raging our the internet over pixels.
He closed the trade. He didn't sell the item. Why is this part of your suggestion?
Just keep insulting me, swear at me some more. Break some more rules and enjoy your ban.
Yeah. I don't know what to say anymore. Is there anyone here that can understand English? Anyone? Anyone at all?
Keep things civil, please. This will be your only warning.
Does it matter why the trade was closed? If the trade was closed and the item didn't sell for 2 ref, then it didn't sell for 2 ref. We don't need a back-story for it.
Yes is does. What if you wanted to sell a mask, but than a day later you want to keep it. then you would close the trade. If he REALLY wanted to sell it, why didn't he keep the trade up?
You're missing the point. You are trying to prove that the item can sell for 2 ref. The trader that you listed ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23433004 ) didn't sell his/her item for 2 ref. Why? Who knows. Does it prove that it sold at 2 ref? No, because the trade's been up for a while and closed 2 days ago with no success of selling that item.
I'm done. I'm just fucking done. I say the same thing over and over and none of you get it. I'm going to make this nice and simple for you. What If He Realized He Didn't Want To Sell It
Again, does it matter? If he didn't want to sell it, then that means your link is invalid due to it being unable to prove that the item sold at 2 ref.
and what does that matter? if he didn't want to sell it, that's on him.
Exactly! I could have meant that he didn't want to sell it! It means he wanted to keep it, and thus it would not be valid for a sell attempt.
Ok just found something interesting. Read the second comment. It says someone bought the mask for 3 ref. The person that commented has a mask in his bp. Skullz could have bought a new one, and forgotten to shade out the mask. Done. Added him to ask more questions.
What link is it that you're referring to? The last link?
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23433004 - ?
Because cross-checking, the second comment, Adomizer, does have a SH mask but it's not the same mask that "sKuLLz" is selling. Same with the inventory of "Ninjapig" and "Mr. Chuckles"
Like I said. Skullz could have sold it, gotten another for himself, then forgotten to remove the saxton mask from the trade.
Edit: I guess the only way to know is to add him. Waiting for him to go online to ask questions.
Also checked BP history on the date he closed the trade.
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197967699919?time=1415520000#
Only has 1 mask, and the ID matches the one listed from the Outpost link.
Forgot to add this, but I also checked the dates within the duration of the trade being up. Didn't have another mask in BP and the same mask is still in BP. Wonder how Skullz could have gotten another mask.
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197967699919?time=1414911600
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197967699919?time=1415001600
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197967699919?time=1415174400
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197967699919?time=1415433600
yuuup this guy is right
This again, i told you before to find proof that this sells for 2 AND THEN come back.
You come with no proof of 2 ref sales and then start raging at everybody.
You clearly don't understand how this site works, you need proof of sales that justifies the suggested price range, and proof that counters the current range, in your case proof that it's impossible to get one for ~1.33 or the ones at that price are sold really fast and proof of people successfully selling it for 1.66-2 ref.
No proof for two. I'm just laughing really hard, give me a second here. All right, now go back to my proof and read it, before making a comment, thanks.
You Got Only 1 Confirmed Sell, The 2nd Sale Has A Private BP. So It's Impossible To Tell.
1st Seller Didn't Sold His.
funnily enough the proof its from the other trade and FROM ME, also 2 of the them didnt sell, funny you telling me to read what ive written
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23714341 1.33 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23726764 1.66 ref
http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Saxton%20Hale%20Mask&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1
1x 1.22ref
1x 1.55ref
3x 1.66ref
Found another sale at 1.66, but none at 2 ref.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23709406
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23714341 1.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23726610 1.33
Im smelling price manipulation :') this war just for 1-2 recs profit? just take a rec from me, what is going on
yeah.. not to mention it being cheaper then buying all the bags and making it was a bit of a sham anyways.
You have a fetish for this hat, don't you?
Why you want up this price so much ?
Upvote because it gives you the power of SAXTON HALE! So powers like this must be used responsibly