- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Resuggesting based on Polar's advice :)
Taking keys as 10 ref
Confirmed Sales:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23622633 (1.13)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23638929 (1.25)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23647604 (1.30)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23626853 (1.50)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23646992 (1.60)
Backpack.tf listings (completed):
http://backpack.tf/u/76561198040827689 (1.40)
http://backpack.tf/u/76561198155071664 (1.70)
1.7 seller has closed his classified ad but it's no longer in his backpack, but we can't prove that it sold for his asking price. Even if it did, you can't base a high end on just one sale. Perhaps a resuggest with a conservative rise but ehh...
Downvote.
1.7 proof?
http://www.trade.tf/classifieds/search/Sell/Unique/Festive%20Medi%20Gun/all/All/2
Bottom of the page :)
I think he means you need proof that it was sold on for 1.7 on a site other than backpack.tf, maybe tf2outpost or something
Hmmm... It appears that he owns one....
Only one sold at 1.7 makes for a poor upper range. Come back with a re-suggestion with a smaller range. Downvoting
Like Lord Skrub said, we don't know whether or not they actually got 1.7 for it.
Would vote for a 1.25-1.6 (or maybe lower?) range. Most other people probably would too, should resuggest with that range. IMO basing the high-end on one sale is fine in this case because we only have 7 sales and they are all for different prices.
we can't see whether or not that guy actually sold his for 1.7 keys
Where did the high-end come from?