- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
1 of 2 hat, only one sale in the past three months
http://backpack.tf/item/1978760703 - first hat
http://backpack.tf/item/1887473590 - second hat
Sale #1
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23133183
Sold for a Time Warp Hermes (3.5 buds, 3.2 after overpay)
However, seller previously had a b/o of 2.5 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22138480 (thx gent)
Taking Sale as 2.5 buds
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198084579694?time=1413529200 >
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198084579694?time=1413702000
I recognize that this is pretty high, but this hat has changed hands only once in the past three months. Since there haven't been any other sales, it seems reasonable to set the price off the only valid, recent sale, and it can be changed if and when another sale occurs.
I find this objectionable on principle, even if it fits within the framework of the rules.
You've made this suggestion knowing full well the value you've suggested is too high.
Just, gives me the shivers.
I'm sorry :(
But, full disclosure here, I'm doing this suggestion on behalf of my friend who bought this for the Time Warp Hermes ~1 month ago. It was a stupid trade, and at the time there wasn't any way to suggest a higher price given that the previous owner paid approx. 1.7 buds in unusuals for it, and the most recent sale on the other hat was still valid. But, a month down the line, he still has it and the other one hasn't resold making his sale the only usable one.
I know it's not the most "right" suggestion, but it is correct, and as I said, someone can re-price it if either of them sell again.