This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed
by A Delicious Cashew™.
There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value.
However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked
in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
Proof is too old to use
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
Comments
One year old price, unfortunately the newest sale was a year ago :/. Ugly range too XD.
Conclusion: Sold at a range from 2.75 to 4 buds, however the most recent sale is at 2.75 so it must be included in the range.
can you provide any sales that aren't 1 year old ?
and i find it cute that you said "most recent trade". which is still a year old kek
Srry, I made it more clear! unfortunately by tracking the item and backpacks I was only able to find that sale at 2.75, which was the last sale of the item. After it was sold, the owner kept it and is still keeping it in their backpack.
and that's why you can't update it. we need recent sales
which this hat obviously doesn't have
I read the rules over because of that, but it says that if there arent any sales within a month then it is ok.
yeah,it is okay to use 1 sale to price an unpriced hat
A VALID SALE
Why is it invalid?
because it is 1 year old
Yes, but that doesn't make it invalid, considering there are still three other sales.
*3 other 1 year old sales
if you want to update this 1 year old price
why are you using more 1 year old prices
by your logic,it's already updated
The prices have changed so much, that this hat's price needs to be updated.
One year old price, unfortunately the newest sale was a year ago :/. Ugly range too XD.
Proof:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12872127 - Sold for dead presidents swagman's swatter ~ 2.75 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9352388 - Sold for 4 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12706269 - Sold for bubbling tc + sweets ~ 3.8 buds
Conclusion: Sold at a range from 2.75 to 4 buds, however the most recent sale is at 2.75 so it must be included in the range.
can you provide any sales that aren't 1 year old ?
and i find it cute that you said "most recent trade". which is still a year old kek
Srry, I made it more clear! unfortunately by tracking the item and backpacks I was only able to find that sale at 2.75, which was the last sale of the item. After it was sold, the owner kept it and is still keeping it in their backpack.
and that's why you can't update it. we need recent sales
which this hat obviously doesn't have
I read the rules over because of that, but it says that if there arent any sales within a month then it is ok.
yeah,it is okay to use 1 sale to price an unpriced hat
A VALID SALE
Why is it invalid?
because it is 1 year old
Yes, but that doesn't make it invalid, considering there are still three other sales.
*3 other 1 year old sales
if you want to update this 1 year old price
why are you using more 1 year old prices
by your logic,it's already updated
The prices have changed so much, that this hat's price needs to be updated.
I saw this and Screamed
Then I saw the outdated proof and i slowly cried
It is the only valid proof we have for it :(