Suggestion: Strange Anger at 1.4–1.6 keys

Price Suggestion

~1.5 keys

584 votes up

142 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Wed, 31 Dec 14 13:24:25 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Message left by moderator:

Solid counterproof has long since been provide. Closing due to counterproof in comments

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

No. Let's stop being ridiculous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeYGiS_hZhU

SELLERS AT / BELOW 1.6:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24098536 1.4

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23825184 1.4

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24170754 1.6

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24158376 1.6

UNSOLD AT 1.6+:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24084887 1.7

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24064478 1.8

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23934313 1.8

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24168802 1.9

1.4 or 1.6 aren't strong enough alone. Range.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5490baf6ba8d880a068b457f

Let it ride.

so you're just gonna ignore 2 keys sales from last suggestion? polar says scm supports 1.4-2 too

The two key sales were old.

SCM should only be supporting proof, and the market does not support.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZsUAqaOiHU

And SCM supports the current price. It's not being used as the sole evidence. It's supporting the previous range. I didn't have an issue with the wide range. Sometimes the wide range shows the uncertainty. Besides, the "old" links aren't so old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24156466

They were old enough for 1.6-1.9 to pass without trouble.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBcDoZnN8ac

too old?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24156466 1 day

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24092735 closed yesterday

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24053128 3 days

They were old enough for 1.6-1.9 to pass without trouble.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBcDoZnN8ac

why do you keep linking us to a youtube video?

They're different youtube videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTaqc3_5oYg

does it look like i care

Then why are you here. Why even post that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUpIg9ZFsd4

I'm here for countering, not for listening ridiculous stuff

Then do some countering. Nobody's making you click links.

The 1.4 sellers have both been open longer than any of your sales.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh2rPGBSamE

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5490a627b98d88d4248b4723

According to OP: "Both sellers have only updated their price to 1.4 recently."

So it's been there for any longer than 2-key sales.

Sold for 2 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24173889

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24057857

For anger is a low price

unsolds at 2 keys?

At time of posting they weren't relevant as the high-end was 1.9.

Considering I have unsolds at 1.7, unsolds at 2 seem unnecessary.

wait, the high-end changed from 1.9 to 2?

It did indeed. Giang... did a thing. I don't want to talk about it.

oh, he included sales at 2 keys

Yeah, old sales that shouldn't have mattered.

ESPECIALLY considering unsolds at 1.7+.

i wouldn't call sales from a week ago/a few days ago old :/

A week old is WAY too old considering 1.6-1.9 is only 6 days old.

This thing is dropping fast.

what about the sales like these?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24173889 - 1 day ago

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24111017 - 6 days ago

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24156466 - 1 day ago

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24092735 - 5 days ago

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24053128 - 6 days ago

Three of those are too old.

Considering even 1 of the 1.4's has been unsold for a week, I'm prepared to discount the other two. The only reason 2 was justified is because 'SCM supported it', and everyone knows SCM is loopy sometimes.

idk, steam community market still supports the 2 key high end though, barely any sales lower than that there

You don't need sales to lower a price. I have a seller at 1.4 that has not sold for a week. Along with plenty of other supporting evidence for this price.

but sales above the suggested price suggests that the range is in-accurate

No, it suggests an outlier.

Also, use of 'sales' is tenuous when you have two valid ones, the bare minimum of 'sales'.

+1 because idk