Suggestion: The Slo-Poke at 1.55 ref

Price Suggestion

The Slo-Poke

Submitted Thu, 18 Dec 14 16:57:20 +0000 by ★ trulyunfathomable

79.7%

1.66 ref

1.55 ref

~1.39 ref

377 votes up

96 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 27 Dec 14 08:26:03 +0000 by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Clesifeeds

http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Slo-Poke&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1

1 x 1.33

1 x 1.44

6 x 1.55

Sellers below

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24195545 - 1.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24118552 - 1.33 unbumped

Sellers at 1.55

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24164416

Unsolds at 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23853615

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24125173

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24138673

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24094565

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24150547

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24124135

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24149398

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24026549

These are all the sellers on outpost...

Classfield can't be counted as first proof

1 seller only at 1.55 for 1.55 price ?

downvote

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24025449 sold for 1.66

dislike ? so many dislikes on bp.

Dunno why they're downvoting but whatever.

The sale you provided mean that 1.66 still happens, so I think a range would be good here.

The price is too old and they're ulsold for a long time.

But your 1.55 hasn't sold either.

That's why I don't need to keep 1.66 in the range.

Here is the other trade that the 1.55 seller created: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24218432

1.66 still sells. It matters because there's such a little market for this hat.

That's why the drop (and range) is necessary.

well, since im new in here, i have some basis in trading and for the success of changing a price the trades must be succesfully completed in order to validate it, so in my opinion its not valid, i don´t know, that´s my opinion, also i have noticed that the classifieds aren completed or removed, also for me is not a lot of evidence so its a no to that.