- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
I'm not surprised that this is priced for this high.
(Okay. Final time I'm correcting this.)
============================================================================
Solds
============================================================================
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24065489 - Sold for a Flaming Bonk Boy + Purple Energy Beak.
28 Buds + 9 Buds = 37 * 0.9 = 33.3 > 33 Buds.
Before: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198001650122?time=1418157262
After: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198001650122?time=1418198400
*Polar suggested 26~30 on Bonk. Taking 28 as the suggested price by polar.
*Mini for Beak: 9 Buds. - http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198010059325?time=1418803200 (Only one I can find)
============================================================================
(Going by backpack history. No trade link available) - He paid "Buds and Paypal", but refuses to disclose. Only able to track 15 buds.
15 buds. Taking as outlier.
Before: (Unable to show, due to lack of backpack history.)
After: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198018106742?time=1418153119
*Outlier due to fact that a Sunbeams Nunhood (30) and a 40+ bud backpack was denied.
*Outlier, since I cannot confirm the contents of this sale entirely nor what he sold it for.
============================================================================
>Flaming Bonk Boy
I mix up Flaming and Burning so much. Pls don't judge. :c
Weak Evidence. What have you got against this hat?
I actually have nothing against this hat. What assumption are you trying to make?
You're making an assumption that it sold for only the Bonk Boy and Beak (before and after is not a trade history)
So you have 1 sale, and pretty crappy proof of that sale.
Down vote from me.
Actually it is two sales, but since the owner of that sale will not disclose the amount of paypal--I'm forced to take as 15 buds. I also worked for that seller and I've remembered many cases where he said he paid "this" for it, but completely lied on how much he actually bought it for.
Second of all, if I recall correctly, you have an association with that seller, since I've seen you on a particular unusual server with him on numerous occasions when I needed assistance with server problems or needed to ask a certain question.
And third, saying I'm crappy at pricing? Take a look at your previous suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/541bb1bfba8d88d72f8b47b2 At least I didn't throw a hissy fit over people telling me to correct my proof and I've corrected this thread twice without hassle. Also, a before and after is a trade history. If you want me to clarify on further proof, then I'll be happy to provide it.
Please redact yourself from this thread. You have some obvious bias here.
The fact that you need to lash out and post such a long story to try and prove your point is all the proof I need that you have no idea what you're doing.
What you have here in a nice little story, nothing more.
If there is a sale and it is not disclosed then that is fine, it is there trade the can do what they want. BUT you can't just pop in in a suggestion with the only proof a crappy before and after of both party's backpack as "proof" why don't you save yourself the embarrassment and close this suggestion.
Yet, you just sold your Team Captain (Ooze) for one. I have the history down below and from what I gathered, you lowballed the shit out of some kid for that Oozing Team Captain. Not only that, you tried to price it for 45 buds and you didn't get a single offer at all on it. So, if I had to take some form of a mini with a price tag on it, your hat is worth 2 buds (since that's the only sale with a price tag on it) and you're an outlier. Thanks for your attempt at a rebuttal and your outlier sold, you made the price more legitimate. Because if we take out (certain person)'s sale, since you've been the only one raising hell about it, you just provided me with two confirmed sales and a mini suggestion on a hat.
If you have a problem with me pricing this unusual, then please provide some form of a counter-evidence. Not you or any of your other friends making remarks that I have something on a certain person, whom you're trying to defend for, or how poorly I'm trying to price this suggestion, when I had the help of polar with the mini-suggestion on the Bonk Boy and you only have one suggestion under your belt.
If you want to continue making yourself a fool, then please continue to do so. You may have friends to downvote my comments or what-so-ever, but you're making a fool of yourself. Just stop. You haven't countered this suggestion at all.
When you say counter evidence that somewhat imply that you have evidence to begin with, cute. Why don't you re-think this price suggestion I know how hard it is, it's a lot of work and no thanks. So let me be the 1st to thank you for your effort but it's just not even close... this proves my point how a before and after is not valid evidence to successfully make a price suggestion. Paid cash for the ooze Tc, that is information it would have taken you a good part of 10th mins to find out.
Quote from a but hurt backpack.tf user: "you're making a fool of yourself. Just stop"
I'm just going to stop replying to you, until you provide actual evidence.
how bout you man up and tell us just how much you paid for yours
Bought it with this: http://backpack.tf/item/3143579060
Will require a mini on that, but I can take it as an outlier. Only sale I can find is like 2 buds. Ooops.
I paid cash check my backpack.tf Rep
You're a joke and so is this price suggestion.
Paid cash, not hard to check my bp.tf rep
the simple way to end the suggestion is to simply provide proof of your payment that is far outside the suggested range.
and yet here you are yelling and screaming instead.
That leads me to believe you paid very close to this range and simply do not want to see reality reflected in the price list.
Cute "yelling and screaming " like I would waste that much oxygen on you.
I am shocked d0 had to come and intervene, definition of sad.
Okay. Stop. All of us have asked you to provide evidence and now you're acting like an elitist.
Just get out, unless you're going to provide evidence.
Burning bonk is duped - http://backpack.tf/item/462104881
A sale cannot be an outlier because you can't track the sale. That's not what an outlier is.
Insufficient proof here imo.
btw, he bought this from SCM - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24065489
But the other got more sales - should use ~2sales if there's 2 or more (useable) and base price from it.
~~~~ polar is king but where is the quote of proof it's "26-30"?
Ask polar. She helped me with the recommendation. I tried to make it 30, because it was offered as 1:1.
I agree. You can choose to report or not report what you paid for an item. Happens all the time and other people don't take shit for it. HOWEVER, if you don't report your sale you lose your right to complain to us about accepting the suggestion. Your sale is considered an "unusable" sale and the hat gets priced based on sales that are usable. If you can live with that, then there shouldn't be any issues here.
The whole hat was paid for in cash.
Okay. If it's true, then show us the certificate of this "cash" you paid for.
Oh, come on d0, you know where the minis are. Clean burning bonk boy passed at 28-32. Took 2 months to sell for 30 pure. There are multiple sales for the duped burning bonk boy in my duped hats thread. The last mini happened 4 months ago and confirmed that it has been ~26-30 for the last ~9-12 months. Given the clean price and the fact that the mini is not too outdated, I'm inclined to believe that 26-30 is about right.
Just saying actual links and all that to provide it is 26-30. Because "about right" is not so convincing.
Also - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24496897
Cuz I think Bob got it fairly cheap (maybe cuz I adviced him #swag #yolo), and the fact the buyer got it for like <10buds on SCM.
Maybe wait until the latest unbox sell and base price of a range with that sale + Bob.
I know about those sales. My question was regarding these sales: http://backpack.tf/item/3270979454
No idea, forwarded.
The person I was disclosing is in there and he will not disclose how much he paid through paypal for it at all. What I do know is 15 buds were transferred in one of the trades. Knowing how some people do fudge their proof and how uncooperative he was being, I took it as 15 buds and took it as an outlier, due to the offers that were presented at the time.
On Wayne's part, he didn't bother to reveal his sale. Instead, he belittled everyone in here and acted like a child. So, I'm assumed he lowballed some kid for the Oozing Team Captain to obtain the Death at Dusk Unusual. I could provide more evidence, but three sales cannot be clarified, because the people won't disclose their sales at all.
Well, I'm asking Bob who would have intimate knowledge of two of the sales to see if he can shed light. If not, then we can't really do much. I'll accept it as is as the only usable sale.
Yeah. I would love to provide more proof, but my hands are completely tied on the matter.
Can be repriced when it sells again. Ooze TC will have to be priced off this instead of the other way around