Suggestion: Strange Apparition's Aspect at 1 key

Price Suggestion

~1.78 keys

555 votes up

78 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 01 Jan 15 20:26:00 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Unsolds at 1.1 keys:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24261839 - 3 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24052975 - 2 weeks (Painted)

Sellers at 1 key:

Classifieds x2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24276439 - 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24275277 - 3 days

Keep in mind there's less than a page on the outpost.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24276439 - unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24052975 - poorly bumped

That's not the link I said was unbumbed. 242 618 39 =/= 242 764 39

gg I'm blind XD

In that case:

Unsolds at 1.1 keys:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24261839 - 3 days

Sellers at 1 key:

Classifieds x2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24275277 - 3 days

3>1

Rather than labeling them "unsolds at 1 key," why not "sellers at 1 key?" By labeling them as unsolds, you are countering yourself in that you're trying to prove that 1 key is a more common selling point.

No he isn't. He hasn't provided any proof of the price being lower, so it doesn't matter.

True. However, it would be better to use sellers. Would you not agree?

~~Or would you rather rage downvote my comments instead?~~

I fail to see how that is a rage downvote. :P I downrated it because of it being unnecessary.

Though it may be better to say sellers, it's still fine to call them unsolds.

Your painted unsold sold: [url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24052975[/url]

Both of your sellers have also sold, this one selling without a bump: [url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24276439[/url]

first link sold after 3 weeks, and he lowered the price so it would sell. Clearly needs a drop

It was also painted a not-so-popular color. I'm not necessarily saying that it doesn't need a drop, just stating changes in the proof.