Suggestion: Non-Tradable Necronomicrown at 0 ref

Price Suggestion

286 votes up

132 votes down

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 08 Jan 15 13:15:32 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Credits to Mindacos for helping me put prices on things.

Free:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24029989

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24336137

Price for this is based off of this (before it was possible to price untradable items): http://backpack.tf/stats/Unique/Necronomicrown/Tradable/Craftable

Did you hear that? It's the Winds of Bans.

~~RedParadox~~<--You soon!

You did it wrong. It would be ~~RedParadox~~

Edit: Great, edit your comment to make me look dumb.

Guy has 0% in 2 suggestions. gg

In the second one it appears the guy paid 1 ref... I could be wrong though

He's the only one in the history, so he most likely got it from the achievement.

Yeah I see now, I misspoke, looks like he paid for the long fall loafers

any more sales?

if your gonna complain about this then dont comment and continue on

Sales aren't needed for drops. Also the market is very limited.

Are we allowed to make items free?

http://backpack.tf/stats/Unique/License%20to%20Maim/Non-Tradable/Craftable

As far as i'm aware, yes.

Backpack.tf prices are meant to be an indicator of the market and a guideline to other sellers... Pricing something at 0 ref and having something unpriced because it's worth so little is the same thing. Also, that Maim suggestion only passed because it was 0.01, and not 0.

I'm not totally against this, I'm just trying to work out if there's a reason why it shouldn't happen... :s

The necronomicrown isn't unpriced, the tradable version of this was priced with untradable sales. This is technically valued at .33

I don't see how .01 ref and 0 ref relates to this. The person who made that suggestion even said .01 was the lowest he could set it to.

There are other samples that have no price - I forgot I commented on the Necro suggestion, my bad. :P

Well, if you can't sell something even for free, why give it a price? The 0.33 value most people won't realise because it technically isn't set on this, but if we ignore that for a second, what is the point of valuing something that people can't even sell for free?

I acknowledge the Maim suggestion went through on that basis, but hell, that was over 2 years ago. Iunno, I feel like this needs clarification.

I've been waiting nearly a week for clarification. Polar even responded to one of these, but didn't say anything in relation to whether it was ok or not.