Suggestion: Strange Boston Boom-Bringer at 8–8.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~27.33 ref

361 votes up

52 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 13 Jan 15 03:51:10 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Charizard

Sellers at 8 ref:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24423073[/url] Boom.

Sellers at 8.66 ref:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24456705[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24397813[/url]

Unsolds at 9 ref:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24372489[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24397500[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24300385[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24305469[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24463469[/url]

And another range because I still hate you

If you found 3 within your range and 5 at the price it is currently why would we need to change it?

Because it doesn't sell

Yes but all of them haven't been sold... you don't have a single sold one there, which is what you need for solid proof. Buyers and solds show that people actually trade them at that price. Also, they haven't even been unsold for longer. The time frame is about the same for both of them.

What?

You specifically wrote "Unsold" on the 9 ref ones and "Sellers" on the ones at your price. Both mean the same thing, but with a different connotation. You have 3 people selling the item at your price and 5 selling it at the current price, so how could this be considered proof?

it shows current price is in-accurate because the sellers at 9 ref aren't able to sell theirs

Yes, but there actually is no difference between these two. The 9 refs have not been there any longer than the 8 and 8.66 refs have. He's just misleading us by changing the category name to "unsolds" instead of "sellers".

if the 9 ref links haven't sold as well as the 8 and 8.66 links, it clearly shows that the price should be lowered