- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Iffy on the range
If you have any constructive criticism, support, or counter-proof, let me know below!
Classifieds:
1 x 2.66 ref
1 x 2.94 ref (??)
2 x 3.66 ref
1 x 4 ref
1 x 4.66 ref
3 x 5 ref
1 x 6 ref
Sold at 3.66 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24852089
Sold at 4 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24673349 and http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24877894
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24218184
Sellers at 4 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24868774 (22 hours old)
Sold at 5 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24864920
3.66 looks like an outlier, and so does 5.
4 ref has wayyy more sales, so it would be better to suggest at that.
Hmm...I'll take a look at it when I get home. Probably will re-suggest at 4 ref flat.
I don't know if my bot matters but he is buying ~4 medi guns every day for 2.66 each. I can provide screenshots of the bot's trade history if someone is interested.
quickbuyers should not be used as proof
quickbuyer? As I can see the price is 2.66 and I am buying for 2.66 not higher so I am not quickbuying and I am not showing more proof I am counter-proofing to show that the 2.66 price is still viable. If I can't buy at 2.66 then the price needs a change but as far as I can see it doesn't
I would count 5 ref and the 2.66-3 ref sellers as outliers on either side and go with 3.66-4.