- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Counter.
None in classifieds.
Sold for 0.11
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24804576
Sold for 0.05
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24851113
Three other sellers on OP, none have set prices.
0.05 sale might seem like it quicksold but it didn't, took 3 days. A guy arguing in the comments of the suggestion I'm countering bought it to make a (false) point.
http://puu.sh/fiEEN/33355ea768.png (the argument)
0.05 trade was made on January 28th.
Buyer's BP on January 30th: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198070486127?time=1422604800 (no Loch)
Buyer's BP on January 31st: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198070486127?time=1422691200 (has Loch)
http://puu.sh/fiE1t/b0ca1477d7.png (weapon he got as change for a scrap)
Credit to Platinum.
Oh so it didn't quicksell, this makes more sense, upvote.
So the other guy bought the loch and load to make the other suggestion look successful.
I didn't use the 0.05 sale because it sold without a bump
Well, if you check the timelines, you can see that Nub got it today.
So technically it did sell without a bump, but sold after 3 days.
I assume he wanted to embarrass the other guy more than anything, but yeah, basically. I only noticed because I searched through OP while reviewing Platinum's suggestion and the seller still had the Loch. Then the guy says it "quicksold" and boom, it's magically gone.
I'm sorry i wanted to make that 0.05 profit
I'm not judging, man's gotta eat.
Only problem i see is that the sold at .55 you provided was bought by a marked trader. Looking into it he was banned for spamming a mod with alts after a earlier ban.
http://steamrep.com/profiles/76561198070486127 (not marked)
thanks for your little detective work sherlock holmes
I meant banned on Outpost.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/218160
Did not know if banned users still counted as valid sellers/buyers, thought it should at least be pointed out.
that's incorrect
What is incorrect? (The ban or if banned users invalidate trades)
Either way I just mentioned it because I was questioning if the trade was still valid.
why would that invalid the trade?
it only makes it invalid if it was traded to someone marked on SR or someone who was banned from outpost for a trade scam(in which they would be marked)
Like I said, I was not certain. I understand now that the trade is still valid.
There's usually a reason that a weapon is worth a weapon.
I'm not that knowledgeable on how this applies to Non-Crafts...
But they're not craftable, so.
Uncrafts are both undesirable by "common" traders and an odd collector item. It's a very weird line they are tip-toeing and their prices often hinge on the whims of individuals.
Uh, why is this still open?