Suggestion: The Panic Attack at 0.22–0.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~0.05 ref

109 votes up

22 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 02 Feb 15 06:29:56 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Easily the worst of the new weapons

Solds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24888247 - 0.33, sold two, has three

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24895946 - 0.33, has multiple for sale, sold at least one

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24858291 - 0.33, mass seller, sold some

Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24910234 - 0.22, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24907609 - 0.22, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24899933 - 0.22, relatively young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24899440 - 0.22, unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24802905 - 0.22, restocker

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24888143 - 0.22

http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Panic%20Attack&quality=6&tradable=1&craftable=1

Tons of buyers at 0.11 so I left that out of the range, nobody's selling for that anyways

Don't know how this'll go, low end might seem a bit weak and I know classifieds should only be supporting proof, let's see what happens, I'll try to add proof as this goes on

Looks good. See if you can find some sellers that aren't bots or big restockers to just aide your suggestion slightly. Not that your suggestion is bad at all. It's just some additional proof to support the dorp : ]

easily the worst weapon in the world

0.33 is the current price...

nobody cares if its being sold at 0.33, what about 0.22... You basicly have no exact proof, btw one of your sellers are inactive or broken

half of them are bots too! and no theres not alot of people selling it for 0.11

I'm gonna downvote this one...

Yes, definitely, half these people who opened trades on outpost are TOTALLY bots and the fact that nobody sells for 0.11 affects this trade so much when I'm suggesting 0.22-0.33. Also, good point, 0.33 IS the current price, you're so smart. What about 0.22? Look at the price I'm suggesting.

Just pointing something out,

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24899933

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24899440

The panic attack in these two trades have sold now

Sellers don't mean anything, Solds are what count.

For example I could be selling the eyelander for 6 keys, but is it really 6 keys??? Obviously not.

Like I said you have no proof, this suggestion is gonna get downvoted and your gonna have a bad rep

Oh, and I'm so happy that you FINALLY have 2 solds, which means NOTHING if you want to lower this price.

"Sellers don't mean anything, Solds are what count."

"...you FINALLY have 2 solds, which means NOTHING..."

You're sort of contradicting yourself there...

I did have a lot of Solds on that suggestion I just didn't bother to list them. Long story short the moderator that closed it messaged me that my -rep would be removed. So I kinda contradicted myself not in particular.

1. What suggestion?

2. How does this show you "kinda contradicted yourself not in particular"?

I apologize I thought you were talking about a recent sugestion I made

Solds aren't needed to drop a price, If I list a team captain for 1 ref less than its current price and it hasn't sold after 1 month with good bumping, I haven't sold anything but I'm showing that a price needs to drop

Ugh, you kinda dropped in a little late buddy.

Recently I have made a Suggestion for raising the Southie Shanobi and a moderator took it down claiming "there were no solds"

Later he removed the -rep because most of the sellers had sold it

That's because you were raising the price, price raises need solds, price drops don't

You know if the price was such a huge deal that it had to be lowered, why don't you have any Solds? God for bid a suggestion like this should be easy since "you don't need solds" Plus you don't haves that many sellers.

Were you like lazy or Something?

The types of proof for raising a price and lowering a price are different so no, he's not being lazy. He's just following the rules.

There's no point in having solds when you're dropping a price, you're trying to show that people are selling for a lower price than the current price

Ok well I'm totally wrong you guys are right! This suggestion is gonna be accepted! Even though there's not enough proof, 2 sellers are broken/inactive, All of them are either quicksells or people who don't give a damn, all of them are poorly bumped, 2 of them Are freak'n bots (look at steam profile), and best of all you lied about "a lot of sellers/buyers for 0.11" WHICH YOU DIDNT EVEN INCLUDE IN YOUR PRICE RANGE!

I'm done wasting my time...

Oh, and do us all a favor and close the suggestion, thanks...

I didn't say sellers at 0.11, I said buyers and I specifically said that nobody's selling for 0.11

Your hilarious there's TONS of people selling for 0.11!

You even included it in your suggestion!

Please, please just close this suggestion... and never make one again...

1. There's no one selling at a scrap: http://www.tf2outpost.com/search/239065339

2. He never claimed people were selling at a scrap.

3. Don't tell people to never make a suggestion again.

I'd love to give a rude comment back at you, but I don't feel like getting banned for a flame war today, he said that because he wants to know why you said that backpack.tf prices are lower than normal

Backpack.tf CLASSIFIEDS moron... Are we even on the same page here???

http://imgur.com/Z8BWTcS

Tell me where I say that there are sellers at 0.11

You made a link that went to a list of sellers on backpack.tf - it's at the bottom of your seller category :P

I don't care about this suggestion anymore, it's just gonna get downvoted til the point it gets auto closed

That's because there's about ten sellers for 0.22 in the classifieds, and I never put that in my screenshot

Good for you

Backpack.tf classifieds often have items listed at prices that are lower than normal. That's one reason they're only used as supporting proof.

So there lower than normal but people sell them for less that what is auctually listed...

At this point, you're speaking jibberish

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/820/444/f64.gif

Uh, what are you trying to say here?

So backpack.tf prices are lower than normal. But even then people sell them for lower than that...

Basically what you said not including how it supports people's suggestions.

I never said backpack.tf prices are lower than normal...

"Backpack.tf classifieds often have items listed at prices that are lower than normal. That's one reason they're only used as supporting proof" does that ring a bell...

When there's 10 in the classifieds selling for a lower price, I don't think that it would be a coincidence

Yes, that's the selling at lower than backpack.tf prices part. Now where's the backpack.tf prices are lower than normal part?

For example If you look at a craft hat that's 1.33, people will sell it for 1.00

That's called a quicksell if one person is selling a craft hat for 1 ref

1. Um, what?

2. CHOCOLATE!! is right. This is becoming too much of flame war. I'm done. Peace!

I never said this suggestion was going to be accepted. In fact, I said that I downvoted it!

Taking another look at your suggestion, almost all your unsolds at 0.22 ref are young and/or poorly bumped, and your solds at 0.22 ref are both quicksells. I'm afraid I'm going to have to downvote this.

Also, this trade:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24907609

Now leads to this trade:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24915149

Bit more proof:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24836275 - sold at 0.22, not sure when it sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24786483 - mass seller at 0.22

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24889931 - 0.22, unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24883499 - 0.22, also unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24835700 - 0.22, 5 days old, gifted