- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Buyers at 3.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24927738
Solds:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24935631#latest - 3.33 in less than an hour.
Sellers:
A lot in sets.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24929048 - Had a buyer for 3.66.
Classifieds at the time of posting
http://backpack.tf/stats/Unique/Snack%20Attack/Tradable/Craftable All 4+ refined.
So if 3.33 went in less than an hour, why is it in the range?
Because he can't find proof for anything else.
this would be a downvote then? i have mixed emotions, has some good proof but hes saying prices for 3.66-4+ yet makes 3.33 ref the suggestion? so downvote
it's complicated.
He can't raise the price to 4.00 since that's relying on classifieds for the price and that's a no-no.
His "buyer" at 3.66 is false since the trade history shows that someone else bought it and it highballing the heck out of it.
He's got what seems to be a valid sale at 3.33 but Glitch Redux's unbumped link could qualify as a QS.
I don't know. :s
Found another sold.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24863316 - 3.33, 5 days unbumped but sold (Possibly a QS?)
It may be that 3.33 is too low but at this point in time it seems like the common trading point. 3 is completely out as so many quickbuyers for 3 and no one sells for 3. 3.33 is buy able and sell able. Due to this I think conservatively bumping it up to 3.33 flat is the best option.
Sounds reasonable, however I think I will just let the mods decide this one.