I can't reply to aaron's comment for some reason. To clarify, this wasn't used to price the AF anger. The anger was priced off the b/o of 20. Which we rarely allow when there are literally no sales in ages. That was the only sale in 7 months and the guy had his trade up for 5 months. I accepted the suggestion actually based more on the burning buto offer and the b/o than the miami veil sale. In the end, it seems both hats are getting priced using the long standing b/o of 20 in pure.

i can't reply to polar for some reason haha

anyhow,seems kinda wrong to price 'em both with the same b/o

better to price it on a B/O of said hat ? http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23057000

buto was duped too http://backpack.tf/item/272189141 but i guess it's still above 20 ? eh

Replies are borked, huh.

Eviction, it's own B/O doesn't matter because it was offered on the Anger. Thus it's the anger's B/O that applies to this trade.

Regardless, we're not pricing this with the B/O anyway. The ANGER was priced with the B/O, and now we're pricing this using the anger sale.

DaMenta

that would actually be quite wrong

as far as i remember,hats shouldn't be lowered with only b/o-s

anger sold for the veil,validating the b/o.

if the veil wasn't offered and accepted,we wouldn't be able to price the anger

edit: i see 3 possibilities

a)not updating

b)using b/o of 30

c)providing a mini for the buto(since it's duped),showing it's >20 buds which would go in hand with polars statement

An exception to the rule was made for the veil. It's a mod and a black belt against you Eviction, maybe trust they we know what we're doing :3

Kenta,you are forgetting aaron is a mod too,also that anyone can be wrong

also,as i stated, polars statement isn't right till the buto is proved to be 20+ buds