- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Unpriced:
old hat, (fairly) new effect, rare sales.
Sale 1
Second most recent sale. 2 months old.
1:1 with a duped lvl. 1 Max’s Head
With overpay, 3.3 x 0.9 = (3)
Before: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198002699095?time=1418889600
After: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198002699095?time=1418976000
Max’s History: http://backpack.tf/item/781730453
Sale 2
Most recent sale. 2 months old and I don’t intend to sell it.
I bought it 1:1 for a C9 Napper’s Respite back when it was unpriced. I paid 3 buds pure for the Napper’s.
With overpay, 3 x 0.9 = (2.7)
Screenshot of Napper sale: http://i.imgur.com/cVWZvhG.jpg
Screenshot of Little Buddy sale: http://i.imgur.com/FxB7PrS.jpg
Before: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198114145497?time=1418889600
After: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198114145497?time=1418976000
Little Buddy History: http://backpack.tf/item/3123941795
Feedback/constructive criticism is very much appreciated. ^^
*Thanks to Techies and Sugarcube for corrections
No need to apply overpay on the Napper's as it was sold for pure, 3 buds flat would do the Amaranthine Buddy fine lol
The LB sold for a hat, not pure. Just so happens the Nappers sold for pure so overpay should be applied.
Why are people going around saying 'If the mini had pure don't apply overpay yaddayaddayadda'
Zcrab even started whining about it on one of my suggestions
If we make a suggestion for a hat with entirely pure sales does that mean we should never apply overpay to any future sales involving that hat? No, it makes no sense because whatever is being priced with that hat sale sold for a hat and not fore pure. I don't understand that logic just like I don't understand why people went in a phase a month or two ago of pricing even 5+ bud unusuals entirely in keys because it happened to sell for keys. Makes no sense for an item of that value, like pricing a cheap unusual entirely in refined. I don't know if its still a common thing anymore since I haven't been near as active lately as I used to be.
I >choose< to ignore that 'if pure mini no overpay' guideline, but this was the first time i fell for it.
Either Zcrab is pushing garbage or there is a new system, i don't know
So I take it I should make a resuggestion pricing it at 3-3.3, calculating overpay with the Napper's priced at 3.5? The reason I had the mini in there is because I thought the hat was supposed to be valued at what it was at the time of the trade, and since it was unpriced 2 months ago but I paid 3 buds for it, I went with the 3 buds. Didn't realize that the guide meant to price a hat at what its value is at the time of a suggestion.
Yis, you do the value at the time of suggestion, not the time of sale lol
There's also a price for the C9 Nappers so I'm not sure what the mini is serving, range should be 3-3.3