Suggestion: The Freedom Staff at 0.33–0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

The Freedom Staff

Submitted Fri, 13 Feb 15 17:04:42 +0000 by ★ Brian

58.09%

0.33 ref

0.33–0.66 ref

~0.17 ref

79 votes up

57 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 13 Feb 15 21:18:04 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Any constructive criticism is appreciated.

http://backpack.tf/stats/Unique/Freedom%20Staff/Tradable/Craftable

Classifieds at time of posting - x2 at .22, x1 at .33, x1 at .44, x3 at .66 & x2 at 1 refined.

Sales at .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24894230

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24920382

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25005196 - sold 3 at .66 a piece.

Sales at .33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25006325

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25035395

Sellers at .33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25040684

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24843326

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25039267

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25036782

You say that my suggestion for a drop is completely unnecessary.

Yet you're doing the same thing for a raise.

I'm dropping it by a reclaimed, you're increasing it by a reclaimed, what's the difference?

The reason your's is practically unnecessary is that 15.33 is a key. It should be like the other suggestion with a 0.*insert number here*-1 key. Plus you have only like 2 sellers at 15. Mine is necessary as .33 can sell and so can .66. .33 sells to much to make it .66 flat so a range is needed.

So what if 15.33 is a key? Ref or keys, still an accurate range.

What's wrong with 2 sellers at 15? Both of them had it for days, and still haven't sold, so you're incorrect there. I put a range because I provided a sold at 15.33(a key) so I kept it in the range.

And if you're saying I only have 2 sellers at 15, same applies to you, you only have 3 solds at 0.66.

*5 solds (actually read the text next to the link or check the trade, either works). I'm entitled to my opinion and so are you. My opinion is that it's unnecessary because 15.33 is a key so I feel it needs a range of *insert number*-1 key as 1 key is still sellable (proven by you). Te reason I feel a key range is also better as keys are constantly fluctuating so this will be more accurate representation.

3 solds as in from how many people. Eh, whatever, we both have different perspectives on it.

15.33=1 key, so either using keys or refined, same result in the end.

Your sellers at 0.33 ref are kinda.... I would recommend taking them out

plus you already have solds at 0.33 anyways, considering that the sellers at 0.33 are invalid

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25040684 - unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24843326 - 2 weeks old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25039267 - unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25036782 - poorly bumped

I actually forgot to check the date, silly me, aha. Whilst I can't edit them out I'll just take them as invalid. Danke :)

Your welcome, glad to help, GL with the suggestion

Please use the term "sales" instead of "solds". It's just bugging me.

Gotcha. ;)

http://gyazo.com/91c4d5b8368d7739890df56e005b7f7f

http://gyazo.com/2c982f3584a088176856cfd43df49f6a

sellers at 0,22 and 0.33, downvote

The .22 sellers I can imagine have sold already. If not, they will soon. .33 & .66 both sell so a range of .33-.66 should fit here.

hmh, "they will soon" is not enough, that vote is open rihgt now, not soon, sorry.

Perhaps I should buy them.....?