- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Credit for proof Goes to Curly Brace As they are the only market for them currently
Sales at 0.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24777670
http://puu.sh/fg4yr.png
http://puu.sh/fg4FF.png
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22273467
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23953781
http://puu.sh/fg8ZF.png
http://puu.sh/fg93l.png
http://puu.sh/fg98X.png
http://puu.sh/fg9e3.png
Sales at 1.00
http://puu.sh/fg52p.png
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24204922
This item keeps going up and down in pricing...
Sales are too old
How can they be when Curly is the only market for them?
Curly's buying at 1 ref, so your only recent proof is for 1 ref. The rest were several weeks ago.
Curly has only increased his price to 1 refined recently to finish his collection off quicker as he only needs 8 now, a vast amount of conches he has where bought at 0.66 Validating the 0.66 in the range. If there where any other Buyers on market then sure the proof would be too old, but seeing as he is literally the only market for this its still valid
The problem is that the increase was made at least 20 days ago: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54cc1416b98d886f088b4692
This is more of a counter, that suggestion passed wrongfully as it lacked proof of the market.
This is the third suggestion that's "more of a counter" and the second with a price that's been successfully countered before. At this point the proof being used is old.
Edit: The increase I was referring to in my last comment was the increase in Curly's buying price, not backpack.tf's price.
Once again, How can they be when Curly is the only market for them?
The size of the market does not have that large of an influence on how long proof is valid for.
Plus constantly switching between a price of 0.66-1 and a price of 1 using the same proof is silly.
Well your welcome to Locate More buyers at 1.00 to disprove the 0.66 in the range, There is more proof provided that curly has bought more at 0.66 then at 1.00, 1.00 has only recently been his buying price as their collection needs 8 more.
And as quoted from Polar "It's a single buyer at 1 ref who showed he has had plenty of success buying at 0.66 ref. Felt there were enough sales happening for a rare item that 0.66 should be in the range."
I don't need to disprove 0.66 as all your proof is too old to be valid. Curly bought many at 0.66 over 20 days ago when the price was at 0.66. Now that it's been increased, you'd have to find new sales/sellers at 0.66. Relying on sales from back when the price was 0.66 won't work.
How do we know these are uncraftable?
You don't, but they were assumed to be in Curly's suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54cc325eb88d88ee1e8b4722
why would I buy craftable versions for 1 ref