Price Suggestion
~21 keys
heart
Unusual Ol' Snaggletooth Circling Heart
143 votes up
3 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

For Scoots~


Even tho this wasn't involved with the Tailor

...stop judging me

...I'M BEING HELPFUL.


Sale 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24872844 'Quick'Sold for Pfetti Dapper's + PFetti Marauder + 3 keys pure + 2 keys in taunts

B/O for Snaggle was 3.7


X = 2*0.9 + 1.6*0.9 + 0.25 + 0.2*0.9

X = 3.7


Dapper's http://backpack.tf/item/275928766

Marauder http://backpack.tf/item/460018800

Snaggle http://backpack.tf/item/3393654286


Sale 2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24450748 Sold for Duped AF Halogen


X = 4.8*0.9

X = 4.3


Halo http://backpack.tf/item/1649110871

Snaggle http://backpack.tf/item/3393654286


Mini for Halo

Cannot find a recent Duped sale that wasn't a QS. Using old price (4.8)


Sale 3 Outlier

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23373672 Sold for 37 keys

B/O for Snaggle was 2.9


X = 2.5


Keys http://gyazo.com/f561bf570c801d012830936881e64bbd

Snaggle http://backpack.tf/item/2680831222


Sale 4

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54eb675db98d88bd4e8b457f Has another sale at 3.9 in pure, enforcing this range.


Quoting BunsZ (Cheers for the Sale, BunsZ)


3 Years old price.. Need the update (:


Sale: Sold for 32 keys + 1 bud (when, the bud is ~ 15 keys) ~ 47 keys = 3,91 bud ~3,9 bud


Backpack before: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197999961045?time=1420444800 ''madafaqckA'''s have 17 keys pure(!!)+ 18 not tradable keys

Backback after: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197999961045?time=1420531200 ''madafaqckA'''s have 18 not tradable keys and have 32(+17 but, this doesn't matter) tradable keys+a bud. So, sold for 32 keys+a bud

"...stop judging me

...I'M BEING HELPFUL."


Nope.

    bu-bu...

      iz ok. just being stupid. Mainly since I'm bored.

        rip meatwad; eaten by suger

          "meatwad eaten by sugar"


          Is it me or is there something inherently wrong with that statement?