Suggestion: Genuine Menpo at 1.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~3.5 ref

101 votes up

67 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 24 Mar 15 21:48:55 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The sold ayy lmao

http://i.imgur.com/sRu3Szo.png

stealing from Cashew. kek

Did you even read his status update?

Upvote (The genuine market is so weird)

Just here to confirm the trade + I had another offer at 1.66 for the one I'm keeping

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.44 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25462867

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.44 http://backpack.tf/classifieds/?item=Menpo&quality=1&tradable=1&craftable=1 6 DAYS Unsold

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.55 ^^Classifieds

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.33 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25420682 *Shit bumped*

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.33? http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25402672 *Shit bumped*

NOT Supporting Buyer for 1.44 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25321299 Credit to last suggestion.

NOT Supporting Buyer for 1.33 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24062657 *OLD trade* Right at mark

NOT Supporting Seller for 1.33 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24719725 *OLD trade* Right at mark

This is a VERY high raise for 1 confirmed sale.

I don't think so. X

Of course, you won't get any sales if you... wait a second... don't bump your trades, boom!

I agree. But all of the evidence is pointing towards it not needing a raise. I mean, the 6 day unsold on classifieds, plus the seller for 1.44 should show that right away. I don't believe 1 single sold at 1.66 shows that it deserves a hike. Especially when we have at least 2 valid sellers at 1.44 with unsolds.

"But all of the evidence is pointing towards it not needing a raise."

Which evidence, 3 sellers that with age less than a day and shitty bumping?

Scm supports a rise, sale was provided.

"I mean, the 6 day unsold on classifieds,"

I call this invalid. Why? my previous reply.

"I don't believe 1 single sold at 1.66 shows that it deserves a hike."

Check my previous suggestions, were accepted with 1 sold or so.

Conclusion: Current price is outdated, there's at least 2 valid MASS buyers for 1.44 on outpost. Your counter proof isn't really can be called valid, due to age and amount of bumps. That's what i'm trying to bring.

If an item can sit for 6 days at 1.44, but one person buys at 1.66, it gets a raise?

I understand Gen Menpo doesn't have the biggest market, but 1 sale vs SELLERS for less. If somebody buys those 1.44's then there's counter-evidence. But also if they just sit there because nobody wants to buy them for even 1.44, seems like good evidence to me.

I have no idea why're you still trying to defend yourself by using unbumped trade.

If there were no sellers at 1.44, then 1.66 would totally be awesome, since there is a sold.

However, it makes no sense to bump up to 1.66, when there are still sellers for 1.44 "oh its not bumped" If you search on classifieds its 1/4 not painted. Not hard to find. The other one IS being bumped, and still not sold. So there's two listed, 1 being bumped, 1 not. Still both there, still both UNSOLD. In addition, when somebody does buy them, it might support a range, but it shows proof for 1.44 a lot more than 1.66. One outlier at 1.66 doesn't merit a change.

Tracking for when/if they sell:

http://backpack.tf/item/3229291369 - Being sold by scrap

http://backpack.tf/item/1161770310 - Being sold by Cpt. Falco.

SOLD

The one being sold by scrap is now in another players bp. Click on the item History.

Your seller at 1.44 ref was created 20 hours ago, not bumped in 15 hours, and doesn't have it in BP.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25462867

http://backpack.tf/item/1169923555

Also the buyer you provided at 1.44 ref helps this suggestion.

Buyer at 1.44 ref and sale at 1.66 ref. This seems reasonable. Only links for under 1.66 ref were never bumped. And SCM supports this, to boot.