- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Sales
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25250501 - sold for 60 keys pure + 2 buds = ~80 keys ( http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198097170886?time=1425917183 )
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25135483 - was part of a deal for golden pan
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25054319 - offered on AF conqueror ~77 keys, rounding ( http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198068974226?time=1424332800 )
Earbuds were 10 keys at the time of the sale. (20 days ago)
good point
For your first sale, from the item history id, it seems to be 8 buds pure + 60 keys
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198097170886?time=1425917183 Sort by time and the 6 buds on the first row have item ID suggesting that they were involved in the same trade.
The item histories don't match (the previous owner), what is more, the buyer had in his backpack only 2 buds + 60 keys the day before he got the antlers if you check his bp history
I am referring to the item ID. In order to do this, you will need to look at the 10 digit numbers on the same row as "dave"
The 6 buds and the IDs:
http://backpack.tf/item/96514945: 3589471795
http://backpack.tf/item/91752052: 3589471787
http://backpack.tf/item/281559982: 3589471771
http://backpack.tf/item/93281761: 3589471759
http://backpack.tf/item/91880559: 3589471743
http://backpack.tf/item/92514158: 3589471737
The keys next to the 6 buds.
http://backpack.tf/item/2676969967: 3589471728
http://backpack.tf/item/2897673058: 3589471719
You can see that the keys which has matching histories have the same first 8 digits as the buds with only the last 2 digits being slightly different. This is an indication that these 6 buds were in the same trade as the keys.
Sometimes, the item history can be deceiving because the buds were obtained immediately before the trade resulting in the history not capturing the buyer's name. This method of using item ID is more reliable.
Yup. Spot on
Thanks for the info, didn't know that. Gonna resuggest then