Suggestion: Hunter Heavy at 5.33–7.33 ref

Price Suggestion

Hunter Heavy

Submitted Wed, 08 Apr 15 19:53:59 +0000 by ★ dei

14.86%

1.66 ref

5.33–7.33 ref

~2.38 ref

11 votes up

63 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was marked as price manipulation and closed Wed, 08 Apr 15 20:03:41 +0000 by neverclever.

It was suspected that the evidence for this suggestion may have contained fabricated trades, or the suggestion was created with malicious intent. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Uh, I doubt it was actually sold for 12 ref and if so why do you suggest 5.33-7.33. Also there are plenty of them for less.

Because. A cosmetic that used to be 1.33 will most likely fail to jump up to 12. And I ended up coming across someone interested in winter cosmetics.

With supported proof maybe, I don't see this un-limited item getting 12 ref anytime soon though GL.

Ty, c: I see where your coming from with this though. If I can find anything, I'll update.

"Zoinks! You've taken a wrong turn."

rip

Yeah. I see that the link is broken.

Link doesn't work.

Several sellers below that price: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25638126

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25402315

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25269211

Obvious price manipulation, especially considering the range doesn't match your supposed sale.

Thanks for letting me know. Not sure what happened to the link. :\

THEN FIX IT.

The link is not broken since there was never a link there to being with.

its not a holiday item tho - its EOTL

Thanks for the correction

If you really sold it for 12 ref, I don't see why you wouldn't set the value to 12 ref.

Because. A cosmetic that used to be 1.33 will most likely fail to jump up to 12. And I ended up coming across someone interested in winter cosmetics.

This still isn't a winter cosmetic. and if the proof existed and supported the claim then there is no reason why it wouldn't jump to 12 or at least have that as a high end along with other similar proof. Again this is all supposing that the proof exists, which judging by the broken link and lack of other purported sales, it does not.

Price manipulation at it's finest

Lol and now my comments are getting disliked by him/his alts or some people who actually think this is valid.

Who cares about comment likes/dislikes. The sane portion of the community knows you are right so leave it at that :D