- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
I need to make a personal formatting style. :\
~~~~~
Outpost research:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23652930 - 1.66 seller.. but... 5 months, sold no1 know when. Ignoring.
The rest are invalid for various reasons. Unbumped for a day+, offers, no set price, low-craft.
~~~~~
Sale at 2 ref: http://imgur.com/klVCDrH.png
~~~~~
Conclusion: 2 ref flat sounds good, 0 valid sellers for 1.66.
~~~~~
Random links that wasn't used as main proof:
Good luck with this. - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25688495
Buyer for 1.66, unbumped, goes as supportive proof: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25666855
~~~~~
1.66 seller is valid, he is just out of stock.
He is not a mass buyer. The only reason why this trade is still open - he didn't sell his Founding Father.
He is not a buyer. And, he just forgot to remove it...
Well, you get my point, item was sold loong time ago, trade is invalid, showed it here just because.
How is he valid if he don't have any in stock? The sale happened on 11th of January - http://backpack.tf/item/3177734804
I.e. too old to be valid. Ez upvote.
Valid but out of stock?
Make 0 sense.
It's confusing, i can't edit.
It is valid, unless he is out of stock
Make 1 sense
plz how 2 improve grammar
how is out of stock valid?