Price Suggestion
Tough Guy's Toque
Submitted by Nebo
~1.66 ref
Unique Tough Guy's Toque
132 votes up
59 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Seller decided to finally bump his trade. ;-;

~~~~~

Weird, but once wearing this hat on a tr8 server got me a deal.

What did i say about trade.tf in prev. suggestion? Right.

~~~~~

2 ref sale: http://i.imgur.com/slkKAM6.png

~~~~~

Outpost research:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25700999 - 1.66 seller

~~~~~

Conclusion: This top hat needs a raise, market is shit, making a range(aka going safe) for now, will resuggest later probs.

~~~~~

Ugh, hat of doom.

    WOT D:

      Aaaaaand we're back to the start.

    Surely there must be some more proof then two pieces? Just by doing the quick math I can tell that there's around 3000-4000 in existence. Even from then you have around a 0.05 representation of the market...

    GL getting this one through

      I DARE you to find valid sellers, literally 1 page on outpost. And most of it is invalid or selling for >2.33

      Nobody cares how many of them are in existence, this isn't unusual.


        I TAKE YOUR DARE and.... BAM! 4 for bp.tf price! http://bazaar.tf/trade/1234442

        BUT WAIT. THERE IS MORE! BAM http://bazaar.tf/trade/819715 another one :O

        Do you think i got lucky? Only 5. NOPE NR 6! http://bazaar.tf/trade/1177842

        That was nice :) that was nice. WAIT SHIA SURPRISE! NR 7 http://bazaar.tf/trade/1197647

          Maybe you will even screenshot random trade servers or use links from tf2tp? :P

          Thanks for digging, but 3 of them are meh bumped and aged >1 month, wouldn't say that they're completely valid.

          And i still have 1.66 in range.

            There was no reason to be rude towards me... I was only pointing out that this likely wouldn't go through because the representation was horrible. Yes I understand these ain't unusuals but I've seen 1:1 unusuals with 2 sets of proof...

              "but I've seen 1:1 unusuals with 2 sets of proof..."

              Because they require it. If i was rude, i'd not appreciate your search for these.